| Home | Register | FAQ | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|
#81 (permalink) | |
|
Read between da lines!
|
Quote:
Yeah seen it mate, useful even for seasoned designers as it says. btw - Where you been? Not seen or heard from ya on 3D either. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#82 (permalink) |
|
On yer bike...
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,691
|
CSS Search Engine: http://skuer.com Last edited by Limbo : 25-10-2006 at 06:34. |
|
|
|
#83 (permalink) |
|
Specialist SEO CMS
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Devon, UK
Posts: 28
|
Don’t try to create your first site from scratch. You’ll spend hours and go around in circles. Initially copy some free templates or use a css wizard and start by just changing one part of the design. Then each site you make you can get more adventurous. You’ll soon get the hang of it with going mad trying to get it to work in all browsers. |
|
|
|
#84 (permalink) |
|
amateur
|
I've been trying to teach myself CSS. We're supposed to be learning it at school, but the instructor who thinks tables are God has been very vague on the details of CSS, and she uses Dreamweaver to teach us. My question is, can CSS be used to make your design (including graphics) a constant, and any and all content seperate. So that if you want to change one link on your page it will change all pages (similar to how frames or php works I guess) |
|
|
|
#85 (permalink) | |
|
Rough Creep Arse™
|
Quote:
No. this isn't what css does. it describes how your html document looks, not the content of a document. |
|
|
|
|
#87 (permalink) | |
|
z-z-z
|
Quote:
...but keep the comments to yourself (except if you want someone else to see them). It is dumb to publish commented markup as in downloading 1-2k bulk data along with your website - although it is insignificant in size, it is still bullshit for the browser. |
|
|
|
|
#89 (permalink) |
|
AshGilpin.com
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 22
|
CSS Only - Overrated
CSS-only sites are quite overrated. What's the point, really? Maybe when CSS3 is widely available then you can do CSS-only sites because CSS3 is supposed to support div columns (something not currently available in CSS2). For the time being, you want to stick to hybrid sites. Use as much CSS for site layout as possible but use tables for tabular data and the such. Plus, doing all of those hacks to get things working on all web browsers - that's just for the birds. You can check out my site, eyepinch.com. View the source. You can see that most all of my site is in DIV/CSS. Only certain pages use tables - hence, only use it when it's needed. |
|
|
|
#90 (permalink) |
|
Web Monkey
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Leeds, UK
Posts: 11
|
ashgilpincom, I have just had a look at your site and it seems to have a lot of hardcoded styles. Where possible you should attach and ID or Class to your div's and implement the style using your CSS. There is also a lot of Javascript code in the page, this would be better being sat in external JS files and just linked to. This helps when spiders traul your site, many have a limit to how much info they scan, so if they have to search through loads of JS at the top of the page they may never get to reading the actual information on the site. Sorry for the rant but you seem to have implemented some good pieces of CSS and followed them up with some poor bits. As a final point you also seem to have put your nav's in as Definition Lists (DL) and Definition Titles (DT) but I would advise you to use Unordered Lists (UL) and List Item (LI) instead. DL's should be used for information and their definitions. So definition lists should have <dl>, then definition title <dt>, then definition description <dd>. Apologies again, if you have any questions I am pretty CSS savy, I've spent the last two years building sites using it everyday. Last edited by olivermonkey : 27-02-2007 at 07:31. |
|
|
|
#91 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
|
A good book to start
Quote:
I read the The Zen of CSS Design: The enlightenment for web by Dave Shea, it's great just great for those who are experienced with CSS, but novice in CSS-layout style.... a book constructed on examples, and includes a lot a lot of useful stuff. Strongly recommend. |
|
|
|
|
#96 (permalink) | |
|
Semantics, yay.
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Salem, Massachusetts
Posts: 1,036
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#97 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 28
|
Ok, stupid question time. I realize that this has probably been answered a bunch of times and in a bunch of ways, but bear with me. I admit that I haven't really started to get into CSS. At this point, I use it to style things like font faces and whatnot as a supplement, but I do most of my sites in Flash or HTML. I'm not really big on CSS as it applies to making a site super flexible. After I've spent a long time working on a meticulous design, I don't want people messing it up by scaling things or changing the layout of the content or anything. I tend to put things where I put them for a reason, and I like the idea o f them staying there. So my stupid question is, what's the huge deal about CSS? I hear all the time about how amazing it is and how everyone needs to start using it. But when it comes right down to it, bearing in mind what I've said above, how will my websites be benefiting from it? If I can get some honest, helpful answers, I'm definitely up to start giving it a shot. |
|
|
|
#98 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
To me it's all about seperating mark-up from content: - what happens when the site needs a redesign in 2 years: In stead of having to recode all of the pages a switch of css file will do the trick. - your pages will still be well browsable without mark-up. This improves SEO and accesibility. - It feels right. It feels structured. |
|
|
|
#100 (permalink) | |
|
Semantics, yay.
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Salem, Massachusetts
Posts: 1,036
|
Quote:
It's just a waste of time to not use CSS. |
|
|
![]() |