| Home | Register | FAQ | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1
|
Does anyone know where a good site for learning XHTML is located at? Also how difficult is it to convert an exisiting HTML doc to XHTML. Is it preferred, will it take over HTML-LOOSE? thanks Denny AV Web Effect http://www.avwebeffect.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | ||||
|
I Ain't Losing Any Sleep™
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 5,236
|
Quote:
http://webmonkey.wired.com/webmonkey/00/50/index2a.html http://www.w3schools.com/xhtml/ Quote:
valid dtd and character encoding: Code:
Quote:
Quote:
That's fuckin' ingenious, if I understand it correctly. It's a Swiss fuckin' watch.
|
||||
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
teh sUxX0r
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 43
|
it is so much like html I just went to www.w3schools.com and picked up on the few changes. All my pages are now coded in XHTML Strict. I had one problem when making this switch, the link target attribute wasn't valid. So I got a simple javascript file and used the rel attribute.. I works fine for people that have up-to-date browsers and the few that dont, well links opening up in the current window, isn't going to kill that much traffic.. but yeah, if you want to see my current site coded in xhtml, http://www.c1tadel.com/lchris220/ and yes.. I suppose html loose is replaced by xhtml transitional... I call them the I don't want to go all the way and bring my site to the top lazy way out of it DTD.. but whatever.. |
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 149
|
XHTML transitional isn't a replacement for HTML loose. It's to help people on the transition from HTML to XHTML so that the jump isn't too extreme. HTML 4.01 has a transitional DTD which was for the same reasons. |
|
![]() |