| Home | Register | FAQ | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1
|
Hey, I'm currently making a website for a major project and i'm wondering what dimensions my website should be, one that pleases all monitors and that fits perfectly in the screen. I'm thinking 800 x 600 Any suggestions? Last edited by Gusstapian : 07-05-2008 at 02:27. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Reset?
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Ankara
Posts: 7
|
Hello, It's all about your visitors. Define your visitors and then decide. But, 800x600 is so old now. I think you will design your site for 1024x768. You can use 960 grid system for designing your site. It's really useful and clean: www . 960 . gs |
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Semantics, yay.
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Salem, Massachusetts
Posts: 1,036
|
What the crap? Just make a website that expands to fit the visitors browser-window with the added details of a maximum-width value, so people with really wide browser-windows don't have to look at something 2,000+ pixels wide. |
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Reset?
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Ankara
Posts: 7
|
Quote:
And current statistics say that only %6.94 of 23,198,062 users use 800x600 resolution. w3counter.com/globalstats.php |
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
Semantics, yay.
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Salem, Massachusetts
Posts: 1,036
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Brooklyn, NYC
Posts: 11,869
|
So do I, but herkalees is right. Ideally, your website should expand/contract to a comfortable width no matter the device viewing it. Find good advice in the beginners web design thread.
patrick o'neill web developer | blog | spam humor |
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Brooklyn, NYC
Posts: 11,869
|
Because it easily accommodates all browser resolutions and text sizes comfortably? Find good advice in the beginners web design thread.
patrick o'neill web developer | blog | spam humor |
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Sir digby chicken caesar
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,596
|
Ah yes but then the content needs to be flexible enough to scale as well - which can be a massive issue in itself. It is a difficult concept for many people to grasp (designer or client). I've seen the look of horror some people get when they watch their website shift as you move the broswer window... after they ask why the paragraph of text isn't the same depth of the image next to it. The web isn't print, but people feel more comfortable when it attempts to imitate it. unconsolidated isoparms
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bristol
Posts: 2,804
|
Fluid layouts can make areas too wide to read comfortably and change the IA of a site, it's not just a comfort thing it's a practicality as well - scalable widths with fixed upper and lower bounds or optional third columns for wider browsers can go some way to please both camps |
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) |
|
Semantics, yay.
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Salem, Massachusetts
Posts: 1,036
|
The internet is not a magazine and shouldn't be treated like one. You (designer/developer/client) can rarely, if ever, dictate what device your web site will be viewed on/in/with. It's time to move forward, people. |
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1
|
Some people should have to pass a test to be able to post here, similar to the way old people should be re-tested to see if they're suitable for the roads. Just because your site design is flexible/liquid, doesn't mean the page is going to get all out of whack at larger sizes. That's where max-width (already mentioned by herkalees) comes in. It fits for EVERYONE! |
|
![]() |