Old 07-05-2008, 02:12   #1 (permalink)
Gusstapian
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1
Website Dimensions

Hey, I'm currently making a website for a major project and i'm wondering what dimensions my website should be, one that pleases all monitors and that fits perfectly in the screen.

I'm thinking 800 x 600

Any suggestions?

Last edited by Gusstapian : 07-05-2008 at 02:27.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2008, 02:45   #2 (permalink)
skunkbad
Registered User
 
skunkbad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Temecula, California
Posts: 14
800 X 600 is safe, but if you look at it in one of the newer widescreen monitors its a little small. Id say 1024 X 768 is a better choice.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2008, 07:31   #3 (permalink)
gameover
Reset?
 
gameover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Ankara
Posts: 7
Hello,

It's all about your visitors. Define your visitors and then decide.

But, 800x600 is so old now. I think you will design your site for 1024x768. You can use 960 grid system for designing your site. It's really useful and clean:

www . 960 . gs
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2008, 07:34   #4 (permalink)
herkalees
Semantics, yay.
 
herkalees's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Salem, Massachusetts
Posts: 1,036
What the crap? Just make a website that expands to fit the visitors browser-window with the added details of a maximum-width value, so people with really wide browser-windows don't have to look at something 2,000+ pixels wide.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2008, 07:47   #5 (permalink)
gameover
Reset?
 
gameover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Ankara
Posts: 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by herkalees
What the crap? Just make a website that expands to fit the visitors browser-window with the added details of a maximum-width value, so people with really wide browser-windows don't have to look at something 2,000+ pixels wide.
herkalees, you mean liquid designs. It's more usable for some, but I think not. Because in liquid designes, a visitor with have 1600x1200 or 1280x1024 resolution, he/she will not be able to use site until resizes the browser window.

And current statistics say that only %6.94 of 23,198,062 users use 800x600 resolution.

w3counter.com/globalstats.php
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2008, 07:58   #6 (permalink)
herkalees
Semantics, yay.
 
herkalees's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Salem, Massachusetts
Posts: 1,036
Quote:
Originally Posted by gameover
herkalees, you mean liquid designs. It's more usable for some, but I think not. Because in liquid designes, a visitor with have 1600x1200 or 1280x1024 resolution, he/she will not be able to use site until resizes the browser window.

And current statistics say that only %6.94 of 23,198,062 users use 800x600 resolution.

w3counter.com/globalstats.php
What? It doesn't matter what size monitor resolution they use, even if they maximize their browser window. If the front-end developer utilizes both a max-width and min-width property:value combination, then all visitors, regardless of monitor resolution and/or browser window size, will view a site/layout that fits their particular environment perfectly.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2008, 08:37   #7 (permalink)
abbasinho
Branding Bitch
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 65
correct.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2008, 09:11   #8 (permalink)
Dusteh
Sir digby chicken caesar
 
Dusteh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,596
<________________________________________I_build_t hem_this_big______________________________________ _>
__________________
unconsolidated isoparms
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2008, 09:18   #9 (permalink)
weldo
now with added beard
 
weldo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 4,963
i like fixed widths ...

you know where everything is gonna stay.
__________________
fuck signatures
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2008, 10:02   #10 (permalink)
Dusteh
Sir digby chicken caesar
 
Dusteh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,596
So do most clients in my experience.
__________________
unconsolidated isoparms
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2008, 10:57   #11 (permalink)
pgo
Moderator
 
pgo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Brooklyn, NYC
Posts: 11,869
So do I, but herkalees is right. Ideally, your website should expand/contract to a comfortable width no matter the device viewing it.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2008, 11:02   #12 (permalink)
d*d
Senior Member
 
d*d's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bristol
Posts: 2,804
I don't see why that's ideal
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2008, 11:05   #13 (permalink)
pgo
Moderator
 
pgo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Brooklyn, NYC
Posts: 11,869
Because it easily accommodates all browser resolutions and text sizes comfortably?
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2008, 11:11   #14 (permalink)
Dusteh
Sir digby chicken caesar
 
Dusteh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,596
Ah yes but then the content needs to be flexible enough to scale as well - which can be a massive issue in itself. It is a difficult concept for many people to grasp (designer or client). I've seen the look of horror some people get when they watch their website shift as you move the broswer window... after they ask why the paragraph of text isn't the same depth of the image next to it.

The web isn't print, but people feel more comfortable when it attempts to imitate it.
__________________
unconsolidated isoparms
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2008, 11:17   #15 (permalink)
d*d
Senior Member
 
d*d's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bristol
Posts: 2,804
Fluid layouts can make areas too wide to read comfortably and change the IA of a site, it's not just a comfort thing it's a practicality as well - scalable widths with fixed upper and lower bounds or optional third columns for wider browsers can go some way to please both camps
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2008, 11:19   #16 (permalink)
Do Gooder
                         
 
Do Gooder's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,323
i only make websites as wide as my face.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2008, 11:24   #17 (permalink)
herkalees
Semantics, yay.
 
herkalees's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Salem, Massachusetts
Posts: 1,036
The internet is not a magazine and shouldn't be treated like one. You (designer/developer/client) can rarely, if ever, dictate what device your web site will be viewed on/in/with. It's time to move forward, people.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2008, 11:29   #18 (permalink)
Do Gooder
                         
 
Do Gooder's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,323
i view most websites with my face.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2008, 12:03   #19 (permalink)
Austin2179
Registered User
 
Austin2179's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1
Some people should have to pass a test to be able to post here, similar to the way old people should be re-tested to see if they're suitable for the roads.

Just because your site design is flexible/liquid, doesn't mean the page is going to get all out of whack at larger sizes. That's where max-width (already mentioned by herkalees) comes in. It fits for EVERYONE!
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2008, 12:11   #20 (permalink)
Do Gooder
                         
 
Do Gooder's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,323
my face is flexible but has a max width. do i pass?
  Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Contact Us - Web Design Forums - Archive - Top
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8