| Home | Register | FAQ | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|
|
|
#22 (permalink) | |
|
i'm done, son
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,262
|
Quote:
Glad we got that sorted. Now we can move on to something important! Just kidding. I perversely enjoy these little semantics games myself. |
|
|
|
|
#25 (permalink) | |
|
competitionmaster 2.0
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 1,367
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#26 (permalink) |
|
dt immigrant
|
Sorry, I'm not sure I follow. Why would it be redundant? <hn>Title</hn> <p>Company bah blah</p> <ul>list</ul> I was too lazy to put end tags... To me the way he worded his sentence "sounds" like a phrase and not like a heading. I might be wrong though. |
|
|
|
#27 (permalink) | |
|
Semantics, yay.
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Salem, Massachusetts
Posts: 1,104
|
To me, the original way I presented it seemed more as a title <hn> that introduced a section containing a <ul>. If said title was a bit more lengthy, then it could be better represented by a <p>, since it would then be more of a paragraph than a title. The way I intend to use it, though, is definitely more Title/UL based. I can see the redundancy in the above example as well, but only when shown exactly like this: Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#28 (permalink) |
|
competitionmaster 2.0
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 1,367
|
yeah, thats what i meant, herkalees. if the second part in the p tag was longer, it wouldn't be redundant, but for your original post, i thought just Our Specialities would be enough. |
|
|
|
#31 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
altough four times "Blah" should hardly be considered to be listural data. |
|
|
|
|
#32 (permalink) | |
|
Semantics, yay.
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Salem, Massachusetts
Posts: 1,104
|
Quote:
|
|
|
![]() |