Old 26-06-2007, 03:55   #1 (permalink)
van pat
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 3
converting jpg to gif

I'm converting Jpg to gif (a logo) in photoshop (cs2 mac).
After save as, first you get a window about index colour saying
Palette: local (selective)
colors:256
forced: black and white
transparency is ticked on
Options -dither: none.
then I press ok and another window saying
Gif options- row order and normal is checked.
Is this ok for a 2 colour logo?
  Reply With Quote
Old 26-06-2007, 04:02   #2 (permalink)
Limbo
On yer bike...
 
Limbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,951
Yes - that'd be OK. But if you want better results save the GIF directly from the source vector.
  Reply With Quote
Old 26-06-2007, 04:21   #3 (permalink)
van pat
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 3
ok, I have gone back to original illustrator file, save for web, have changed it to gif, not png and the other options are set on:
lossy 0
selective colours 256
diffusion dither 100%
transparency is off so is matte
interlaced is off and web snap 0%

is this good?
  Reply With Quote
Old 26-06-2007, 04:24   #4 (permalink)
steveb
389 ppm and rising
 
steveb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Järvenpää, Finland
Posts: 4,030
That's fine - in fact, you can probably get by with 64 or 32 colors too, since there are only two colors. The file size will be a bit smaller.
__________________
My free fonts www.utfi.net
  Reply With Quote
Old 26-06-2007, 04:48   #5 (permalink)
Limbo
On yer bike...
 
Limbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,951
I sort of disagree with that steve - depends on the logo and the colours.

Gifs of only a few colours are such a tiny file size it seems pointless to remove any as it could weaken some of the depth - getting the best colour match you can will usually mean using 256 - for the best aliasing - and it'd only save you a few bytes anyway.
  Reply With Quote
Old 26-06-2007, 05:30   #6 (permalink)
adpitch
Senior Member
 
adpitch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 283
If it's a 2 colors logo - you may try to use less colors (16,32 or 64)
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 26-06-2007, 06:32   #7 (permalink)
Dusteh
Sir digby chicken caesar
 
Dusteh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,996
I'm with Limbo, it all depends on the anti-aliasing, the less colours you use - the more blocky the transitions become.
__________________
unconsolidated isoparms
  Reply With Quote
Old 26-06-2007, 08:08   #8 (permalink)
steveb
389 ppm and rising
 
steveb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Järvenpää, Finland
Posts: 4,030
Just try a few examples using "Save for Web" in Photoshop. You'll be able to compare the effects of using more or fewer colors. I'm pretty certain you'll agree that there is no perceptible difference , when there are only two colors present in the logo, between using 64 or 256 colors. This isn't a matter of opinion. It's certifiable fact!
__________________
My free fonts www.utfi.net
  Reply With Quote
Old 26-06-2007, 12:10   #9 (permalink)
adpitch
Senior Member
 
adpitch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 283
Quote:
Originally Posted by steveb
........I'm pretty certain you'll agree that there is no perceptible difference , when there are only two colors present in the logo, between using 64 or 256 colors. This isn't a matter of opinion. It's certifiable fact!

I totally agree with this statement!
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 27-06-2007, 11:04   #10 (permalink)
weldo
now with added beard
 
weldo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 5,175
so, its just me that tends to go : save for web > gif > ok

without thinking about it (unless things look obviously wrong) ... ??
__________________
fuck signatures
  Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Contact Us - Web Design Forums - Archive - Top
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8