Reply LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 27-08-2005, 16:33   #1 (permalink)
nakedintruder
www.nakedintruder.com
 
nakedintruder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Leeds, Yorkshire
Posts: 383
Send a message via MSN to nakedintruder
help: business case(s) for XHTML Strict

Can anyone tell me any? Can you put together a business case for having a site validating against XHTML strict that'll have any legs?

I've done a betting site at work which is going live on Tuesday, all my submitted designs were valid XHTML strict but from working with 3rd party developers now don't validate.

I want to correct this in a 2nd phase, but how can you get the business behind you to let you do this? What can you encourage them is in it for them? I have plans to add features which involve AJAX, but I don't think that's dependant on totally valid code, any ideas?

Thanks.
  Reply With Quote
Old 27-08-2005, 17:40   #2 (permalink)
paulanthony
mingin dawg baitch
 
paulanthony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Belfast
Posts: 1,040
Send a message via MSN to paulanthony
Future site compatibility...Mobile phone access to the site down the line...that sorta stuff?
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 27-08-2005, 20:41   #3 (permalink)
illvibe
say werd.
 
illvibe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Japan
Posts: 1,293
Improved SEO? More accessible? Easier to integrate with dynamic elements?
  Reply With Quote
Old 27-08-2005, 23:03   #4 (permalink)
nakedintruder
www.nakedintruder.com
 
nakedintruder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Leeds, Yorkshire
Posts: 383
Send a message via MSN to nakedintruder
Because it's pretty much valid as is, it's already got that, it's just stuff like & isn't & and things like that, but I still want to get it sorted, I want to totally seperate the JavaScript too. I just can't think of a business centred case for it.
  Reply With Quote
Old 27-08-2005, 23:25   #5 (permalink)
pgo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,340
  Reply With Quote
Old 30-08-2005, 04:47   #6 (permalink)
nakedintruder
www.nakedintruder.com
 
nakedintruder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Leeds, Yorkshire
Posts: 383
Send a message via MSN to nakedintruder
Cheers, that's more about what's been done already too, I'm at a kind of stage where it's pretty much there, but I need to get really small things chased out to fully validate, I reckon I'll be stuck with it.
  Reply With Quote
Old 30-08-2005, 05:21   #7 (permalink)
smallbeer
I Ain't Losing Any Sleep™
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 5,202
Quality Assurance - although the site may render fine today even though it doesn't validate, unless you validate against the spec, there's no way of knowing that it will render fine tomorrow.

Accessibility (to a point) - web browsers do a good job of rendering pages even though there are errors in the code. Some other devices may not.

http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2004/xhtml-faq#whycare

Quote:
Why should I care if my document is in correct HTML? It displays all right on my browser.

All browsers know how to deal with correct HTML. However, if it is incorrect, the browser has to repair the document, and since not all browsers repair documents in the same way, this introduces differences, so that your document may look and work differently on different browsers. Since there are hundreds of different browsers, and more coming all the time (not only on PCs, but also on PDAs, mobile phones, televisions, printers, even refrigerators), it is impossible to test your document on every browser. If you use incorrect HTML and your document doesn't work on a particular browser, it is your fault; if you use correct HTML and it doesn't work, it is a bug in the browser.
  Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Contact Us - Web Design Forums - Archive - Top
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8