| Home | Register | FAQ | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: England
Posts: 1,143
|
Quote:
Are you Serious? War is Gods way of teaching Americans Geography
Wot Speeling Mishtake? |
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
.
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: .
Posts: 1,757
|
Its all dependent on screen resolution, not just monitor size. Right click on your desktop, click properties and then go to the settings tab. Fiddle with your resolution and see how things change. Different users use different screen resolutions, so the most popular ones must be catered for, which is why websites based on 800 x 600 were so popular a fwe years ago. As the most used resolution is now higher (1024 x 768), websites are being made wider. |
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 318
|
Quote:
i'm sure if you make it small enough it will show up on any browser on 1024x768 no? |
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: England
Posts: 1,143
|
I am amazed you say you do web design yet have no idea how resolution and pixels work. the resolution is how many pixels are being displayed, so 800x600 means 800 pixels wide and 600 high. The image you see on your screen is produced by a graphics card or on board graphics chip . If you have your graphics settings set to 800x600 and view a web page with a fixed width of 1000 pixels, then obviously you are not going to be able to see the whole page on your screen and you will have to scroll left and right to see some of the content. Monitor size will only effect the visual size of an image, if you have a 13 inch monitor that is capable of running 2000 odd pixels and you set the graphics card to show this, then you will have difficulties reading text or even making out desktop icons, but output to a 28 inch and everything is nice big and easy to read. War is Gods way of teaching Americans Geography
Wot Speeling Mishtake? |
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 318
|
Quote:
Well I'm more into the DESIGN part than the WEB part. But thanks for the explanation. |
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: England
Posts: 1,143
|
Quote:
until this year it was standard industry practice to make all website viewable for people who used 800x600 , by making the content no wider than 780 pixels, give or take a few. Again see link provided above to see what "safe areas" are However the statistics this year show that as people replace older machines, upgrade or actully learn they can change to higher resolution, the need to support 800x600 resolution is dying. This year the BBC website abandoned its 800x600 support and went over to 1024x768. The whole argument though is do you abandon 800x600 support when a significant percentage of your visitors still use this? War is Gods way of teaching Americans Geography
Wot Speeling Mishtake? |
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) |
|
Its me Wrams
|
I have a 24" HD Monitor and a GForce FX 8800 GT Graphics Card in my tower. My settings are set at 1920x1200 pixels and some sites look small others fit perfect and look great. If you running a standard onboard graphics card then you need to find the best display settings for that card. Most onboard graphics cards will only support up to 1280x720 before making everything look nasty. The best way for you to learn what size is good for screens is to learn pixel ratio then try different settings, so even people with low resolution will see your site as you intend it to display. |
|
![]() |
|