| Home | Register | FAQ | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| DesignersTalk > flash VS html, exciting VS boring |
| View Poll Results: Flash VS Html | |||
| Flash |
|
9 | 31.03% |
| HTML |
|
20 | 68.97% |
| Voters: 29. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Kirin beer goggles
|
flash VS html, exciting VS boring
One of the problems we have, is that when clients look at accessible websites we make here, they complain that the text looks shit in their browser. This is the inevitable internet explorer or firefox on the PC. It's especially bad for Japanese text, which only comes in two fonts for the PC. SIFR doesn't work with Japanese. Currently we (eat, the company I work for) are working on a new "client impressing" website for ourselves, but also something that is respected by our peers. Although the main audience really is our clients or potential clients. The site doesn't need to be dynamically update-able, or necessarily something that is to-the-nuts accessible. Flash renders text nicely across all browsers, can be selectable, and with some clever coding the same content can be visible to the 4% of users without flash. As I say, there will be minimal updates. I guess one of the things to remember is that our clients and web browsing people in general have no idea what flash is, all they know is that some websites are boring or shit, and other websites are fun and fancy (often the flash websites) - which we cringe at - but are none the less popular. Some good flash agency sites: LESS RAIN WCRS Agency Republic - Four times Digital Agency of the Year Dave - Creative Business Consultancy - Brand Consultants Some good html agency sites: ________________kleber________________ RINZEN Hi-ReS! London (yeah totally blows on accessibility though) Good hybrid sites: POKE Outside Line. Digital Communications glue London :: Most Respected Agency 4 years running :: Home So, your vote is welcomed, and you may even influence the outcome. Please post links to Agency sites that you think reflect your viewpoint. cheers Last edited by hawken : 26-06-2008 at 02:41. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Whitey
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Yokohama, Japan
Posts: 7,288
|
I personally prefer flash. The downside though is that it may be thought that your agency only does, or only can do flash, which could detract customers looking for an HTML site. If you want to use other fonts, then how about SIFR? I've never used it, but its supposed to work well. I don't know if it works with Japanese though. |
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bristol
Posts: 5,041
|
Quote:
I think most clients will not be as aware of all the differences between a flash site an HTML site, they will simply see a 'website'. I would consider using flash for the type of site you are considering, if you end up getting more flash work leads than html would that be a good thing for eat? |
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Kirin beer goggles
|
yeah it's certainly a consideration as you guys say, we did have a chat about here. I'm not certain what the demand would be after doing this but lets just say we are happy making websites fullstop, so ne bother as to the medium. |
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
incomputable
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Marylebone
Posts: 843
|
A hybrid is the best choice. HTML/large fonts/white space to promote your accessibility and a flash header (or other) to wow your clients. The best of both worlds. In regards to the Japanese font not looking good on the Eat site. It doesnt look half as good as the english version. I think you're just going to have compromise and add more images. AQ did a good job of it. |
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
Kirin beer goggles
|
Quote:
you talking about aqworks? They used to have a nice site, the new one is pretty gash compared. Their Japanese font is the same looks just as bad as it does on eat unfortunately. I do bring it up with them sometimes |
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bristol
Posts: 5,041
|
Quote:
he who chases two rabbits catches neither |
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Comic Greatness..
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Lakeville, MN
Posts: 18
|
I personally agree that a balance of both flash and html are the best. If you are looking for flashing functionality I would look into Spry, AJAX, something like that to make your page a little more interesting. As far as a business is concerned I believe that good content and awesome samples will take you further than any flash movie. Nate Johnson Comics - Illustration - Web Design |
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Web Developer
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,739
|
Flash is great when used wisely, as I have seen some really good all flash sites, but for heavy content sites I would avoid it. For a portfolio for a design agency, it would be an ideal way to show off. All depends what you want the site to do. For example, the BBC news site, or a forum, would suck if made in flash. But I think smaller sites like Top Buzz makes wouldn't be anywhere near as good if he used XHTML instead of flash. Even though I am a developer, and dislike flash sites, I think for a portfolio it is hard to argue that using flash would be bad. |
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) | ||
|
incomputable
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Marylebone
Posts: 843
|
Quote:
yeh. I like the little touches on that site, I think it would appeal to the Japanese sense. maybe it's just me I like the hand drawn style. Quote:
You mean the SIFR wordpress plugin doesnt work? You have to click the [embed] button next to the anti-aliasing option on the font property pannel. Now you can even have sifr for Japanese websites I am sure you have researched though... did you mail the developers ? Might be a nice opportunity to pinoneer Last edited by nini : 26-06-2008 at 09:40. |
||
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,336
|
As we all know, Flash is only useful for places where HTML/CSS/JS won't cut it. So, you might consider doing some hybrid thing. If you built an all Flash site, don't you think you'll get the kind of clients who want all Flash sites? I guess it comes down to which kind of clients you want to attact. Those who care about accessibility, platform agnosticism, etc. Or those who are mesmerized by shiny, moving objects. |
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) | |
|
Kirin beer goggles
|
Quote:
the problem is the font size, most Japanese fonts are over 4 mb. If you don't mind waiting for 4mb per SIFR on the page, then sure, it works! |
|
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 304
|
Quote:
How about making a 'troubleshoot; fonts don't work?' box somewhere on there, maybe in png, just to make sure they'll see it. Then offer up the sifr 4mb embed edition as a parallel thing, just in case the lightweight pages won't work for them. -
|
|
|
![]() |
|