| Home | Register | FAQ | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|
#41 (permalink) |
|
Interactionist
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Manchester
Posts: 174
|
I use an IBM ThinkPad. The only requirement for university was Windows XP or 2000, and in December the Apple line hadn't switched to Intel. Sadly, I have been craving a Mac since, they now run Windows, and I haven't touched .NET since I bought it. What I'm saying is that if you study Web Development (as I am) or Computer Science you will probably end up having to work with Microsoft .NET (We have a hundred iMacs and eMacs on the next floor, but we use Pentium 4's...) but now you can pick up a MacBook, install Linux and Windows, and you wont have any problems. |
|
|
|
|
|
#43 (permalink) | |
|
i'm done, son
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,262
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#44 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bristol
Posts: 3,060
|
The biggest problem with using a Mac for web design and the reason i have a PC to code up all my sites (I design them on a Mac- OSx is much a much better UI at the moment) is that you will need to test what sites look like an a PC |
|
|
|
#45 (permalink) |
|
i'm done, son
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,262
|
I honestly don't understand why people like the OSX UI so much. I don't like the way it browses hierarchical And besides, design software (PS, Illus., InDesign, etc) has the exact same UI on both OSes (except for some minor aesthetic differences)...as far as I've seen...anywho. I prefer the taskbar/Quick Launch to the dock/finder any day. |
|
|
|
#46 (permalink) | |
|
Rough Creep Arse™
|
Quote:
Each to their own at the end of the day.. I've got used to the OSX interface and I really like it a lot. Going back to Windows having used it a handful of times in the last 10 months, I find it very archaic and a lot of the time it doesn't make sense. |
|
|
|
|
#48 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bristol
Posts: 3,060
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#49 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Bristol, UK
Posts: 11
|
Ah the old Mac vs PC debate, will it ever die Now we have Intel Macs that do a good job of emulating PCs I guess not being able to run PC software is no longer a great argument, however where cost is an issue then a pc is the best choice. I use my XP laptop to demo sites to clients as I can use the built in web server to handle asp stuff and xampp for the php stuff. Sure I could upload it to a test server but what if your meeting is in a pub (my meeting place of choice My laptop cost about £200 so I don't mind the odd beer splash, how about your Intel Macbook ?? |
|
|
|
#52 (permalink) | |
|
i'm done, son
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,262
|
Quote:
I don't know about the OSX search function. I rarely use search functions at all because I'm so damned good at organizing my files. |
|
|
|
|
#53 (permalink) |
|
Designery Boy!
|
There are a lot of comments here both for and against the use of Macs and PC's..... I have been a long time user of both Windows, Mac and Linux (and still am!).... all have their pros and cons.... i guess there are three things that it boils down to: 1). REQUIREMENTS - what is the system for; how much perfomance is required... 2). BUDGET - £40k Mac Pro video editing system; £600 laptop for portability and terminal services... 3). LONGEVITY - notebooks and laptops have a short lifespan when compared to a desktop system... I've used a substantial variety of systems in my time; but i couldn't pick one system that does it all... If you're planning on purchasing a new system, assess the three criteria above, read up on both features and flaws of prospective machines (if i knew my MacBook Pro would get hot enough to cook eggs, i might have thought twice!!) demo the systems if you can, ... and above all enjoy your new tool!!! |
|
|
|
#54 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 5
|
I must say I love my Powerbook but it's invaluable to be able to test web pages on Internet Explorer 6 (and 7 soon) so if you don't fancy insalling a PC emulator (or shelling out for an 'expensive PC'), PC's are the best choice. In terms of coding/graphics there's nothing between the two, other than different OS's which is a personal preference. |
|
|
|
#57 (permalink) |
|
Designery Boy!
|
my trials of Boot Camp have been vaired to say the least.... if you're looking for OS emulation on a mac please look at http://www.parallels.com/.... their software supports many OS's that Boot Camp doesn't.... Bomski (PS - be wary of running Windows Vista Release Candidates on your mac; there have been unconfirmed reports of Vista causing MacBook Pros to significantly overheat to the point of hardware failure) |
|
|
|
#58 (permalink) |
|
can't draw but can code
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 109
|
I've just recently switched to a Mac and frankly it works well enough for design. Unfortunately Photoshop is way too slow for me under Rosetta so I use my old PC for Photoshop work. For programming the Mac is fine, Smultron is my favorite text editor for it, and because of its BSD core I can use it as an Apache server for testing, but I've already designated my old PC for that job. Frankly I'm more productive on the Mac because there are less distractions for me. I don't have any games that could distract me, and trust me I lack the self control to resist them otherwise. Really it's a matter of preference. If you liked your old Mac then you'll like your new one. It's simple. |
|
![]() |