Web Design Forums

pgo · 30-05-2006, 16:10

http://slashdot.org/tmp/slashdot_redesign/

It's definitely an improvement. Much easier on the eyes.

sub · 30-05-2006, 16:20

A big steaming pile of doodaa IMHO.
But it is an improvement nonetheless.

Dusteh · 31-05-2006, 03:48

I think its good considering the restrictions of the competition, must be the same green, must have a white background etc etc.

cam · 31-05-2006, 04:11

Definitely an improvement, it doesn't look quite so 1995 now

Red Cap · 31-05-2006, 05:28

agree with dusteh i think they did a good considering all the restirctions. need some new icons though

Limbo · 31-05-2006, 05:31

it's an improvement - but that's not exactly hard.

I think it's awful.

Stickman · 31-05-2006, 05:53

I agree.

Red Cap · 31-05-2006, 05:57

the site needs a complete overhaul, but that wasnt the point of the comp. Really they should have invested more time and money, but for what it is - a super cheap frontend with little implementation fuss, i reckon they havent done too badly. From a design point of view, agreed nothing special.

pgo · 31-05-2006, 10:38

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red Cap

need some new icons though

You must not be a Slashdot reader. Or not appreciate tradition and nostalgia.

lou · 31-05-2006, 11:30

it looks pishflaps

Stickman · 31-05-2006, 11:42

I agree.

Red Cap · 31-05-2006, 17:16

ok it looks gash

hawken · 01-06-2006, 04:33

gash is a good word to describe that redesign

30equals · 01-06-2006, 05:13

Quote:

Originally Posted by cam

Definitely an improvement, it doesn't look quite so 1995 now

no, more like 1998

30-05-2006, 16:10	#1 (permalink)
pgo Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 12,340	Slashdot Redesign Winner http://slashdot.org/tmp/slashdot_redesign/ It's definitely an improvement. Much easier on the eyes.

30-05-2006, 16:20	#2 (permalink)
sub Shitcasket™ Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Brighton Posts: 4,311	A big steaming pile of doodaa IMHO. But it is an improvement nonetheless. __________________ Follow DT updates on Twitter: http://twitter.com/designerstalk

31-05-2006, 04:11	#4 (permalink)
cam vague™ Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Glasgow Posts: 5,513	Definitely an improvement, it doesn't look quite so 1995 now __________________ The Blog™ \| Twitter \| LinkedIn

01-06-2006, 04:33	#13 (permalink)
hawken Cornish Pasty Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Tokyo, Japan Posts: 2,711	gash is a good word to describe that redesign __________________ my blog & portfolio sexy combined package

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

31-05-2006, 03:48	#3 (permalink)
Dusteh Sir digby chicken caesar Join Date: Sep 2004 Posts: 4,865	I think its good considering the restrictions of the competition, must be the same green, must have a white background etc etc.

31-05-2006, 05:28	#5 (permalink)
Red Cap senior member Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: auckland, nz Posts: 274	agree with dusteh i think they did a good considering all the restirctions. need some new icons though

31-05-2006, 05:31	#6 (permalink)
Limbo Baskin' Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 5,649	it's an improvement - but that's not exactly hard. I think it's awful.

31-05-2006, 05:53	#7 (permalink)
Stickman Dr. Lucien Sanchez Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: UK Posts: 5,527	I agree.

31-05-2006, 05:57	#8 (permalink)
Red Cap senior member Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: auckland, nz Posts: 274	the site needs a complete overhaul, but that wasnt the point of the comp. Really they should have invested more time and money, but for what it is - a super cheap frontend with little implementation fuss, i reckon they havent done too badly. From a design point of view, agreed nothing special.

31-05-2006, 11:30	#10 (permalink)
lou flaps Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: aberdeen Posts: 179	it looks pishflaps

31-05-2006, 11:42	#11 (permalink)
Stickman Dr. Lucien Sanchez Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: UK Posts: 5,527	I agree.

31-05-2006, 17:16	#12 (permalink)
Red Cap senior member Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: auckland, nz Posts: 274	ok it looks gash

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)