Web Design Forums

pgo · 06-10-2005, 07:05

Probably just a hiccup. Works for me.

lucidcreations · 06-10-2005, 07:35

If he did I'd second that. I know this isn't the showcase area, but mate those sites look REALLY dated.

pcswebmaster · 06-10-2005, 07:45

Quote:

Originally Posted by Transmogrify

There's been massive debate about this on a mailing list I'm on. Some guy moaning at sites not working on his 1600x1200 screen when he claims they should be able to, if coded correctly (essentially using ems for everything, images included). I'm going to do some tests this week and see how/if it's possible.

My screen res is 1920 x 1200. Means I can two browsers on the screen at once.. jazz site on the left, DT on the right. Everyone is a winner.

It would be silly for anyone with screen res of 1600x1200 to browse full-screen, i like my 1600x1200 display 'cos i can tile four windows at about 800x600 each, makes browsing easier. I design sites to look good at 1024x768 but also to work in 800x600. Why alienate people with older systems!

Brown · 06-10-2005, 07:49

Quote:

Originally Posted by pcswebmaster

It would be silly for anyone with screen res of 1600x1200 to browse full-screen.

why? what a ridiculous thing to day.

pgo · 06-10-2005, 08:57

Also, why on earth would you need more than one browser window? That's what tabs are for.

I browse full screen at 1280x1024 (and if I ever switch to 1600x1200, which I do for certain things, I browse full screen there, too).

smallbeer · 06-10-2005, 08:58

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brown

what a ridiculous thing to day.

I'm having an odd day too.

Brown · 06-10-2005, 12:23

oh. i meant 'to say'.

irishdunn · 12-10-2005, 09:10

I couldnt click the link because your dogs blinky red eyes scared my cursor away.

irishdunn · 12-10-2005, 09:11

well you changed your icon so ditch that last statement and any humor attached to it.

cframe · 13-10-2005, 20:09

I'm surprised no one has mentioned fluid width layouts yet, they're a pain to get working right but when they do work they're usable by everyone no matter what res theyre running at.

View Poll Results: How wide are yours?
600 x 300 (640 x 480) - "You can never be sure"	0	0%
760 x 420 (800 x 600) - "Don't forget us"	19	65.52%
955 x 600 (1024 x 768) - "Power to the people"	6	20.69%
Or above - "I'll drag you into the future kicking and screaming!"	4	13.79%
Voters: 29. You may not vote on this poll

06-10-2005, 07:35	#22 (permalink)
lucidcreations Part of the 3 out of 4 Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: cheshire Posts: 2,077	If he did I'd second that. I know this isn't the showcase area, but mate those sites look REALLY dated. __________________ Jase

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

06-10-2005, 07:05	#21 (permalink)
pgo Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 12,340	Probably just a hiccup. Works for me.

06-10-2005, 08:57	#25 (permalink)
pgo Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 12,340	Also, why on earth would you need more than one browser window? That's what tabs are for. I browse full screen at 1280x1024 (and if I ever switch to 1600x1200, which I do for certain things, I browse full screen there, too).

06-10-2005, 12:23	#27 (permalink)
Brown volkswagen yellow & gold Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: london, england. Posts: 6,147	oh. i meant 'to say'.

12-10-2005, 09:10	#28 (permalink)
irishdunn Im just learnding Join Date: Oct 2005 Posts: 85	I couldnt click the link because your dogs blinky red eyes scared my cursor away.

12-10-2005, 09:11	#29 (permalink)
irishdunn Im just learnding Join Date: Oct 2005 Posts: 85	well you changed your icon so ditch that last statement and any humor attached to it.

13-10-2005, 20:09	#30 (permalink)
cframe Registered User Join Date: Oct 2005 Posts: 12	I'm surprised no one has mentioned fluid width layouts yet, they're a pain to get working right but when they do work they're usable by everyone no matter what res theyre running at.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)