Web Design Forums

reezluv · 05-08-2007, 10:33

hey..i'm confused here..what is the diffrence between the 2.0 logo design anda web 2.0 designed?

Is it related with each other?or Logo 2.0 did'nt exist?

brooks · 05-08-2007, 14:48

Who cares?

I'd say 'Logo 2.0' defines the shiny & reflecty logos only, where as faux-web 2.0 states the design ambitions to be fun with stripes, gradients and big letters which was overdone and became a cliché of itself with some top notch and some awfully over the top sites as with most things. web 2.0 should, if it has to, have denotations of a user-interactive web akin to wikipedia, youtube, forums & the social-network generation.

RaelRode · 05-08-2007, 16:37

Web 2.Oh is just a buzzword, it means nothing it's just easy for people to give it a name. Basically, if you want to design "good" stuff stay away frm Web 2.Oh.

OutThisLife · 21-08-2007, 19:43

<starburst>Beta!</starburst>

It's not a design style in the real world, unfortunately a lot of the people think it is and like to use the term.

cjgraphix · 25-08-2007, 17:28

Web 2.0 is about user interaction and not design. Essentially they are marketing terms meant to increase costs for clients who don't know any better.

Logo 2.0 is nothing that I have ever heard of before.

The web is the web, and doesn't change from version to version.

Do Gooder · 25-08-2007, 18:21

it's all a bag of shite.

Nudoo · 25-08-2007, 23:01

Forgive me if im wrong but web 2.0 was formed when people discovered / created AJAX / Ruby which are new to the web.

People felt that AJAX was a step forward from previous methods, such are bog standard javascript, they put the hype on it by calling in web 2.0

Then people started creating basic sites with oversized buttons, gloss and shadow effects on logo and put 2 and 2 together and got 5 ( web 2.0 design ) which in my eyes can't be futher from the truth since it's design that all basically look the same with a different color here and there.

Then of course since you had this really cool new method of making sections of the site fold in, slide out and drag about, you just had to make it beta before it was in it's finalised stage, which we now know never get finalised or was always been "finalized" but they just like the look of the spikey circle with beta in the middle.

roto · 25-08-2007, 23:54

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nudoo

Then of course since you had this really cool new method of making sections of the site fold in, slide out and drag about, you just had to make it beta before it was in it's finalised stage, which we now know never get finalised or was always been "finalized" but they just like the look of the spikey circle with beta in the middle.

Ha!*

*beta

05-08-2007, 10:33	#1 (permalink)
reezluv Registered User Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 7	Logo 2.0 & Web 2.0 what is the difference? hey..i'm confused here..what is the diffrence between the 2.0 logo design anda web 2.0 designed? Is it related with each other?or Logo 2.0 did'nt exist?

05-08-2007, 14:48	#2 (permalink)
brooks inventer of the left-hand Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Leeds / Lincoln Posts: 1,298	Who cares? I'd say 'Logo 2.0' defines the shiny & reflecty logos only, where as faux-web 2.0 states the design ambitions to be fun with stripes, gradients and big letters which was overdone and became a cliché of itself with some top notch and some awfully over the top sites as with most things. web 2.0 should, if it has to, have denotations of a user-interactive web akin to wikipedia, youtube, forums & the social-network generation. __________________ Flickr Photos

05-08-2007, 16:37	#3 (permalink)
RaelRode Designers are strange :) Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Shrewsbury, UK Posts: 1,735	Web 2.Oh is just a buzzword, it means nothing it's just easy for people to give it a name. Basically, if you want to design "good" stuff stay away frm Web 2.Oh. __________________ If it works, it's valid.

25-08-2007, 18:21	#6 (permalink)
Do Gooder Join Date: May 2007 Posts: 4,302	it's all a bag of shite. __________________ anti social marketing

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

21-08-2007, 19:43	#4 (permalink)
OutThisLife Not a designer. Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: 127.0.0.1 Posts: 31	<starburst>Beta!</starburst> It's not a design style in the real world, unfortunately a lot of the people think it is and like to use the term.

25-08-2007, 17:28	#5 (permalink)
cjgraphix Website Developer Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Pacific Northwest Posts: 334	Web 2.0 is about user interaction and not design. Essentially they are marketing terms meant to increase costs for clients who don't know any better. Logo 2.0 is nothing that I have ever heard of before. The web is the web, and doesn't change from version to version.

25-08-2007, 23:01	#7 (permalink)
Nudoo Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 123	Forgive me if im wrong but web 2.0 was formed when people discovered / created AJAX / Ruby which are new to the web. People felt that AJAX was a step forward from previous methods, such are bog standard javascript, they put the hype on it by calling in web 2.0 Then people started creating basic sites with oversized buttons, gloss and shadow effects on logo and put 2 and 2 together and got 5 ( web 2.0 design ) which in my eyes can't be futher from the truth since it's design that all basically look the same with a different color here and there. Then of course since you had this really cool new method of making sections of the site fold in, slide out and drag about, you just had to make it beta before it was in it's finalised stage, which we now know never get finalised or was always been "finalized" but they just like the look of the spikey circle with beta in the middle.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)