Web Design Forums

veruca_pepper · 31-01-2007, 18:12

Just joined here...

Found a massive site network - Freefor Networks. It has a load of sites that target cities around the US (and the UK apparently also).

I think it's a great concept, just not sure if it would fall under the Web 2.0 category...

John Good · 01-02-2007, 01:52

what a f*** is that ?

Dusteh · 01-02-2007, 03:56

has it got a green and blue logo, with reflections? If the answer is yes, then its web 2.0

canglan · 03-02-2007, 08:49

The most important factor to judge a site 2.0 or not is whether or not it's community driven.

solidgold · 18-02-2007, 12:31

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dusteh

has it got a green and blue logo, with reflections? If the answer is yes, then its web 2.0

dont forget dropshadows galore and a nice diagonal banner

RaelRode · 18-02-2007, 14:03

If you mean http://www.freefornetworks.com/ the no its not. Its just got a reflective banner.

solidgold · 18-02-2007, 14:07

no, that doesnt look 2.0ish, it seems that rounded corners have been somewhat neglected of late

liquid6 · 21-02-2007, 21:18

Its got a bit of a web 2.0 feel to it, but I wouldn't go as far to say it is full out web 2.0. I didn't look at the code.

mike_m · 22-02-2007, 06:39

I vote that the next person to blather on pointlessly about whether a site is 'web 2.0' or not based solely, on trend following design, gets bludgeoned to death with a wet dog.

weldo · 22-02-2007, 07:48

i agree ...

bring back web 1.0.3.7

karloff · 22-02-2007, 07:54

i vote we create a firwall between 'the people that can't be arsed talking about web 2.0 (aka the web 1.0.3.7 people, as stated by weldo)' and the web 2.0 lovers!

then we can break it down in years to come and be free!!!

mind you, i like the mikes idea with the dog

oli · 22-02-2007, 09:14

Quote:

Originally Posted by mike_m

I vote that the next person to blather on pointlessly about whether a site is 'web 2.0' or not based solely, on trend following design, gets bludgeoned to death with a wet dog.

aye, web2.0 is a progression of the web not a design style.

ngsupb · 17-05-2007, 21:17

wouldn't say the header is very web 2.0

tomr2006 · 17-05-2007, 23:25

Argh, you know shit's turning for the worst when web trends are given a label. It's not the most creativity friendly concept this whole 'web 2.0' business...

hello · 21-05-2007, 08:50

er, spam?

Larixk · 22-05-2007, 05:12

this thread really is the epitome of Web 2.0. Let the community decide whether a site is Web2.0 or not.

What's the point for a site being web2.0? Do you get fancy animated blinking gif labels you can put on it?

ArcticFox · 23-05-2007, 23:10

It does look abit like web 2.0, but not.

Paddy · 23-05-2007, 23:44

What's the correct etiquette these days for dealing with a client who asks for "a Web 2.0 kind of style"?

Is it the wet dog thing?

pgo · 24-05-2007, 14:52

Quote:

Originally Posted by ArcticFox

It does look abit like web 2.0, but not.

Where's that wet dog...

brendan hart · 29-05-2007, 03:29

erm its a web2.0 forum, so web 2.0 is what should be discussed, would some one please enlighten me on what web2.0 is? 70s-80s look is my guess? (stripes)

31-01-2007, 18:12	#1 (permalink)
veruca_pepper Registered User Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 2	Would this be considered Web 2.0? Just joined here... Found a massive site network - Freefor Networks. It has a load of sites that target cities around the US (and the UK apparently also). I think it's a great concept, just not sure if it would fall under the Web 2.0 category...

01-02-2007, 01:52	#2 (permalink)
John Good + Join Date: May 2005 Location: Tropical Networks Posts: 1,321	what a f*** is that ? __________________ Fonts are like cologne: A bad choice speaks louder than a good one. Justin Feinstein

01-02-2007, 03:56	#3 (permalink)
Dusteh Sir digby chicken caesar Join Date: Sep 2004 Posts: 4,061	has it got a green and blue logo, with reflections? If the answer is yes, then its web 2.0 __________________ unconsolidated isoparms

22-02-2007, 06:39	#9 (permalink)
mike_m Work faster microphone .. Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Cambridge, UK Posts: 1,706	I vote that the next person to blather on pointlessly about whether a site is 'web 2.0' or not based solely, on trend following design, gets bludgeoned to death with a wet dog. __________________

22-02-2007, 07:48	#10 (permalink)
weldo now with added beard Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Liverpool Posts: 5,233	i agree ... bring back web 1.0.3.7 __________________ fuck signatures

03-02-2007, 08:49	#4 (permalink)
canglan Registered User Join Date: Sep 2006 Posts: 27	The most important factor to judge a site 2.0 or not is whether or not it's community driven.

18-02-2007, 14:03	#6 (permalink)
RaelRode Designers are strange :) Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Shrewsbury, UK Posts: 1,735	If you mean http://www.freefornetworks.com/ the no its not. Its just got a reflective banner.

18-02-2007, 14:07	#7 (permalink)
solidgold Staring at the Sun Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: UK Posts: 62	no, that doesnt look 2.0ish, it seems that rounded corners have been somewhat neglected of late

21-02-2007, 21:18	#8 (permalink)
liquid6 Prepress Extraordinaire Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: New York, NY Posts: 21	Its got a bit of a web 2.0 feel to it, but I wouldn't go as far to say it is full out web 2.0. I didn't look at the code.

22-02-2007, 07:54	#11 (permalink)
karloff Junkie[scum] Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: location, location Posts: 1,647	i vote we create a firwall between 'the people that can't be arsed talking about web 2.0 (aka the web 1.0.3.7 people, as stated by weldo)' and the web 2.0 lovers! then we can break it down in years to come and be free!!! mind you, i like the mikes idea with the dog

17-05-2007, 21:17	#13 (permalink)
ngsupb Registered User Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 17	wouldn't say the header is very web 2.0

17-05-2007, 23:25	#14 (permalink)
tomr2006 Registered User Join Date: May 2007 Posts: 19	Argh, you know shit's turning for the worst when web trends are given a label. It's not the most creativity friendly concept this whole 'web 2.0' business...

21-05-2007, 08:50	#15 (permalink)
hello Registered User Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Brisbane Posts: 21	er, spam?

22-05-2007, 05:12	#16 (permalink)
Larixk Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Utrecht, Netherlands Posts: 933	this thread really is the epitome of Web 2.0. Let the community decide whether a site is Web2.0 or not. What's the point for a site being web2.0? Do you get fancy animated blinking gif labels you can put on it?

23-05-2007, 23:10	#17 (permalink)
ArcticFox Web 2.0 GURU Join Date: May 2007 Posts: 15	It does look abit like web 2.0, but not.

23-05-2007, 23:44	#18 (permalink)
Paddy Grammar Deputy Join Date: May 2005 Location: Béal Feirste Posts: 942	What's the correct etiquette these days for dealing with a client who asks for "a Web 2.0 kind of style"? Is it the wet dog thing?

29-05-2007, 03:29	#20 (permalink)
brendan hart Invincisible Join Date: May 2007 Posts: 221	erm its a web2.0 forum, so web 2.0 is what should be discussed, would some one please enlighten me on what web2.0 is? 70s-80s look is my guess? (stripes)

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search