Old 02-10-2005, 17:59   #1 (permalink)
Luke Redpath
Barney army!
 
Luke Redpath's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London
Posts: 696
What is Web 2.0?

http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/orei...is-web-20.html

Interesting article. More discussion here:

http://37signals.com/svn/archives2/t...ent_web_20.php

Web 2.0? Marketing buzzword or more than that?
__________________
Luke Redpath .::. Software Engineer .::. Reevoo - Real Reviews From Real Customers
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2005, 21:21   #2 (permalink)
pgo
i'm done, son
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,262
I think it's a buzzword.

But at the same time, there's the notion of the nature of the web changing significantly - especially when you look at the list that you find on O'Reilly. It definitely signals a change in the way online applications are built and presented (AJAX comes to mind), but I don't think you can call it "Web 2.0" - because how do you define where a new version of something like the web starts and ends? You can't - because the web evolves, like a living thing and you never read anything in a biology book about "Elephants 1.0beta" (that's wooly mammoths, for you laymen ).

It's just a buzzword, but there's a grain of truth inside.

Interesting quote...and it's from a blog!

Quote:
My main critique here is: "web 2.0" is now a purely retrospective concept. It has little to do with a "next generation" future, other than in the sense that what has been popular in the recent past will likely continue to be so in the near future.
The Era of Web 2.Over

And from Digital Web Magazine...something of a counterpoint...
Quote:
Jay Fineberg has an interesting post over on iCite entitled The era of web 2.Over which goes into detail about Tim O'Reilly's recent essay about Web 2.0 and it's future. From Jay's point of view, the Web 2.0 discussion is now a "purely retrospective concept." This is true if you are paying attention to early adopters and trend setters. However, if you look at the vast majority of people using the Web it is not. For example in a recent study Forrester reported that only 6% of consumers currently use RSS. Contrast this with how many consumer sites might be using AJAX, blogs, or implementing folksonomies, well, you get quite a different perspective. For the majority of web users out there, Web 2.0 hasn't even hit yet.
RSS is supposedly a "Web 2.0" concept. I don't use it. I tried once, I wanted to be hip, but I see very little use for it. You know what I do when I want to see if a site's been updated? I open my browser and click the bookmark.

There is one exception to my aversion to RSS. Google.com/ig is absolutely the best application of RSS I've ever seen. I pick a few sites - Wired, Slashdot, NYTimes, BBC - and feed those directly into the page, which is set as my homepage. So, when I open my browser, I take a look at what looks interesting. Nothing? Then I go to another site.

Last edited by pgo : 02-10-2005 at 23:16.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2005, 05:17   #3 (permalink)
smallbeer
I Ain't Losing Any Sleep™
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 5,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by pgo
RSS is supposedly a "Web 2.0" concept. I don't use it. I tried once, I wanted to be hip, but I see very little use for it. You know what I do when I want to see if a site's been updated? I open my browser and click the bookmark.

If you didn't find it useful you obviously didn't need it. It's not about being hip. There's no way I could keep up with all the sites I read without feeds. ATM I'm subscribed to 83. Some are feeds for the beat surrender, letting me know when a contributor adds some content waiting to be edited. Some are my ongoing projects in basecamp. And the majority are blogs/sites I read daily.

Checking my bookmarks regularly would be a nightmare.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2005, 05:40   #4 (permalink)
pgo
i'm done, son
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,262
Very true. If you're reading that many sites, I suppose it is handy.

I know it has nothing to do with being hip - I was being more sarcastic than anything. As in, "everyone else uses it, I should be, too!"

And, also, I have so much free time at my job, I have the time to check sites manually.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2005, 05:42   #5 (permalink)
d*d
Senior Member
 
d*d's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bristol
Posts: 3,048
Web 2.0, so there was a Web1.0? - it's a buzzword for now, but it may stick as a historical index when our grandchildren are looking at the birth of the web.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2005, 05:47   #6 (permalink)
pgo
i'm done, son
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,262
Quote:
Originally Posted by d*d
Web1.0?
This is Web 1.0

So is this.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2006, 07:56   #7 (permalink)
dreamdatum
Designer
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 15
Thanks for the info
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2006, 08:22   #8 (permalink)
finbarr
what a pile of dogshit?
 
finbarr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: london
Posts: 2,449
Send a message via MSN to finbarr Send a message via Skype™ to finbarr
Quote:
Originally Posted by pgo
fucking hell, pgo... you do find 'em, dont you? That Peter Pan thing is hilarious
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2006, 08:36   #9 (permalink)
datahound
Spare Parts
 
datahound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Bracknell Forest
Posts: 4,620
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2006, 08:47   #10 (permalink)
finbarr
what a pile of dogshit?
 
finbarr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: london
Posts: 2,449
Send a message via MSN to finbarr Send a message via Skype™ to finbarr
Quote:
Originally Posted by datahound
quality
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2006, 10:06   #11 (permalink)
pgo
i'm done, son
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,262
You know I look good in green.

What's with the thread resurrection?

I take back what I said about RSS earlier. I don't use it much, but I do use it some and it's sort of useful.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2006, 10:08   #12 (permalink)
sub
Shitcasket™
 
sub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Brighton
Posts: 3,656
Send a message via MSN to sub Send a message via Skype™ to sub
Quote:
Originally Posted by pgo
What's with the thread resurrection?

I noticed that earlier with another thread dug up from 2003.
Something to do with Adwords - we'll never know because 'they' have been spring cleaning again
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Contact Us - Web Design Forums - Archive - Top
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8