| Home | Register | FAQ | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Baskin'
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,227
|
From Quark to Indesign...
What are the advantages apart form the obvious cost difference? I know that the integration with illustrator and Photoshop is great - PDF writer is better and proof printing outputs EPS's perfectly. but what else? What are the drawbacks - is there any (apart from getting to know new software) - have you found that most printers are happy with indesign? Seems all printers accept/prefer PDF's these days and it's where we are headed, but wanted some informed opinions off you lot. Thanks. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Crazy diamond...
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Liverpool (UK)
Posts: 746
|
We've just moved over to InDesign and its just so much better than Quark - printings a doddle, the built in effects have reduced the amount of time we have to use illustrator and photoshop and I can really say its been the best investment we've made recently. I don't think it'll cause a problem as so many people are moving over to it - the only people not so keen to move over (in my experience) are some repro houses who have problems with the rip outputting the built-in effects like text dropshadows over images etc. A few want to stick with Quark cos they know how to get around rip problems whereas InDesign would mean re-learning an InDesign for its outputting limitations and work-arounds. PDFs are certainly more accepted at repro houses but some do still have problems with those effects etc. On the whole I'd say stick with it - Quarks a dog in comparison! Just my 2p! |
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Crazy diamond...
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Liverpool (UK)
Posts: 746
|
You betcha! Counting the seconds that make up my dull days until they're on; not so much "Wish you were here", more "wish I was there"! The weather forecasts not so good for them though, so the first song will probably be 'Goodbye Blue Sky' |
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
Baskin'
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,227
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Crazy diamond...
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Liverpool (UK)
Posts: 746
|
Wont do any harm - I've used Quark since it was Quark 2.12 and have only just changed over (got CS2 on a Photoshop upgrade). At first its a bit daunting but once you've rearranged the key strokes to the sort you've used for Quark it becomes a lot easier. The hi-res previews, printing sep previews, link updating etc are just so useful I've not missed Quark one bit. Seriously. We output to a Canon CLC 3220 using Quark and it pushes the tick marks off centre so backing up a job is a nightmare as we have to off-centre the reverser page. With InDesign it backs up perfectly first time and processes quicker - that in itself is worth its weight in gold. |
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
™
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,612
|
Quote:
I think they will play 'Breathe' WYWH and 'Comfortably Numb' any idea what time they are on? |
|
|
![]() |