| Home | Register | FAQ | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | ||
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 304
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,097
|
Quote:
No self respecting professional web developers use WYSIWYG editors. Also slating Linux because Adobe choose not to support isn't fair. It's like me slating Macs because they don't play Direct X games. |
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 304
|
Agreed. - I wouldn't use WYSIWYG either, but that's what the man asked for. Linux is "slated" (read: "concluded/deemed/doomed") by the outlook that _if_ CS3/Adobe won't be supported natively on there, then in all likelihood and realistic measure noone else will step up to the task either, atleast in terms of usability / being more than useless in any real Adobe-ish task. You could twiddle-dee until Linux gets a real Creative Suite of some kind, but by that day we'll be drawing designs with our fingers in free air instead, hence it'll be a day or two too late. -And if you're going for Linux just to use a text-editor, then it's better to choose an OS with a few more possibilities. |
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,097
|
Quote:
eh? I am struggling to understand your logic, unless you are just talking from just a graphic design point of view? So in your opinion Linux is doomed because it isn't supported by a company that charges thousands for its software. Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight! OSX is Unix based, as is Linux, so it would actually be easier to port CS3 to Linux, than to Windows. The reason they don't bother is because they would then have to support it, and the majority of Linux users don't like paying for software, so it wouldn't be worth them bothering. Open Source the code, and it would get ported quickly, the ball is certainly in Adobes court, and it doesn't support Linux because it doesn't want to - not because Linux is unable to run CS3. I use Kubuntu Linux as my main operating system, it does nearly everything I need it to:
If I need to do some ASP.NET development, or want to play a game, I boot into Windows. Otherwise I use Linux. |
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) | ||
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 304
|
Quote:
Given the model of Linux, whatever changes happen, and whereever the road go, it'll always in a sense be "the right" road [for Linux,] which is fine and respectable, but then it'll always continue to be just Linux, too.. - Impressive as hell, and what a great effort, but still same 'ol _Linux_, y' know? .. Wishing for everything to become OpenSource is a little overly optimistic, to say the least, but saving that wishlist in ODF-format might keep it openable when the time comes.. Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,097
|
Quote:
I was trying to point out that if the code runs on OSX, it will easily be portable to Linux as they are both based upon Unix. The only reason Adobe CS3 doesn't run on Linux isn't Linux's fault, nor the fault of the Linux community - but because Adobe don't want to support it for the same reason you Mac won't play BioShock. Money. I find it deeply ironic how you are slagging off Linux and its open source community on a forum that would only exist if it were for them developing Linux, PHP and MySQL. But as you are talking mainly from a Graphic Designer's point of view, you are correct in saying that Linux does lack decent software for your work. Nothing quite compares to Adobe's software in this field, even the free alternatives like the GIMP and ink scape aren't as good, but you musn't grumble as they are free! |
|
|
![]() |