[iamtq]

Pink-Different

Hi,

This is just one of my ideas of creating a web template store, affiliating with mytemplatestorage.com, and templatemonster.com etc.

Anyways, i just want some feedback on what you think of the design, and some suggestions please. Some of the links aren't working, because i haven't finished yet, but the templates and web design is up.

Thanks,

Tariq Giaziri - Pink-Different

[iamtq]

great reviews guys, keep it up

[iamtq]

i was being sarcastic if u didnt realise....hmm..could make a habit of talking to myself...

[iamtq]

hey good lookin'

[pat]

shut up.

The site layout is ok, the banner i don't like. I don't think the greyscale goes well with the pink highlights. Also, i'm not ken on the edgy logo. Some nice business templates though

[jamiep]

Yeh, your logo is shit.

[BarkingSheep]

+ve's

I like the overall layout, the navigation in the banner and the colour scheme.


-ve's

The grayscale image in the banner doesn't sit right for me.

I prefere the logos in your webdesign page than the "pd" logo, that areas also seems a bit boring compared to the rest of your page.

Why do i have to scroll sideways? - OSX and Safari

WebDesign page; http://www.iamtq.com/pd/img/design_40.gif - dont like the dodgy gradient.

Any who ... what do I know ...

[Michal]

Sorry mate, don't like it much.

The layout is too messy... no consistency, and some things look like they have been plonked down... and the Google ads aren't helping it.

I'm not too big on the colour scheme either.

[Narate]

Is that website purposely alot worse then the templates to make them look better?

[iamtq]

Yeh will defintly change the logo, thanks for the constructive criticism *cough*, ill get workin..

[cam]

the code behind that design is absolutely shocking

[andyv123]

I like the way your code is written in xhtml, shame it doesn’t validate as xhtml:

http://validator.w3.org/check?verbos....com/pd/3.html - 78 errors

Using Dreamweaver layers and JavaScript is probably not the best way!

[cam]

Originally Posted by andyv123

I like the way your code is written in xhtml, shame it doesn’t validate as xhtml

forget the validation for now, it has font tags and spacer gif's for fuck sake

[C4D]

is it a competition to find stuff wrong with the site? Give the man credit ffs, there are far worse websites out there guys!

The logo really isnt that bad apart from the text isnt very visable.

Maybe some animation would add to the butterfly theme you have gone for? These are just ideas, pan em, do what you thinks best.

Try to keep a bit of consistancy with your text/images/fonts and make it a little easier to read, dont let it overlap images or colours.

I like the ideas and imagry and the basics are in you now just need to build on it before you move on to other pages.

[Jelly Baby]

well i thought it was visually ok.But i havent a clue about the world of web.But visually i didnt think it was that bad

[Brown]

Originally Posted by C4D

Maybe some animation would add to the butterfly theme you have gone for?

yeah, animate the butterfly, not seen that for a while.