| Home | Register | FAQ | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 346
|
New Portfolio Design
Before I convert this to wordpress, can I have some critique on the design? Thanks. 2 Column NEW VERSION State College Web Design | State College SEO | Brambling Design edit: New link Last edited by tim710 : 10-07-2009 at 02:03. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Killin' time
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: A self called Nowhere
Posts: 1,226
|
A similar problem I'm having with my portfolio design is the spacing between your nav links and your nav icons. Make it consistent, yet stay to a grid. Speaking of grids, your nav AND header are both off. Try switching that bird and your header around. Black bird against black bg. :\ Beige seems too dark. Lighten it up or try a light blue. |
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Doodler.
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 2,707
|
Is Your Logo Big Enough Other than that, mostly the same points as w1sh, the whole nav/title/logo area feels rather confused. And i'm not a huge fan of the icons on your navigation either, home being a house sure, portfolio being folder *yawn*, services being... a wireframe of a globe? erm ok and contact being a speech bubble. they smoothly fade and what not but the lines breaking up the buttons are so faint, it looks a bit awkward as the text is left aligned and the icon is right aligned. Spell technologies right, nothing says you use cutting edge technologies like not having a browser with a spell checker installed. Infact your blurb is actually rather offensive, unless you're competing directly with template sites (cheapppppp), your implication is most other designers out there are producing template based websites. Which simply isn't the case. |
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
barred
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: London
Posts: 3,786
|
Quote:
Ohr weeeary? ![]() "," As for the actual design... The header is a complete mess. The space between the title and the ugly bird illustration is off, the space between the navigation and the unnecessary icons is off. The logo in general doesn't fit in with the rest of the design. I'm a self facilitating media node, flavorin.
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
barred
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: London
Posts: 3,786
|
Why the hell would someone make icons when there's loads of high quality free use ones. Doesn't help anyone if you have a bunch of badly made icons. I'm a self facilitating media node, flavorin.
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Doodler.
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 2,707
|
Have to say it does make me sometimes question the skills of an agency if they're using essentially clip art for their own site, most agencies I know of wouldn't use icons on their own sites at all, or would make their own. I suppose the exception being things like the famfamfam silk icons which crop up everywhere really. But I might be a bit jaded after seeing lots of sites posted in showcase lately which have absolutely no design skill but have slapped some glossy free icons in as demonstration of their abilities. (not actually suggesting this site is one of those, but it is rather flawed currently) |
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
barred
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: London
Posts: 3,786
|
Well these icons aren't especially fitting either way. But if you're going to use icons and you're not an amazing illustrator/pixelpainter it's always better to use the free sets. On most sites I don't really see the reasoning behind having the text "and" the icon anyway, what's the point? I'm a self facilitating media node, flavorin.
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Doodler.
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 2,707
|
I suppose, but I'm all in favour of nothing at all, or for very sparing use of icons. Like you say, sometimes its entirely redundant, I get the feeling sometimes because they find them for free, people want to force them in to a design and it doesn't compliment it. |
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
www.grafikkid.com
|
It has great potential. I agree with most of the comments above, especially the one regarding the size of your logo. Also, pay attention to contrast. I don't think the white on lime green works very well. Either pick a different color or make your strokes/dividers thicker. The bird image gets lost in the BG as well. |
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) | ||
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 346
|
Quote:
Because most people use wordpress as a blogging platform over a cms, and I don't want them to be thinking I'm just a blog theme designer. And I have yet to see a design you've come up with using wordpress as more than a blog with a few pages. Quote:
Hmm, I suppose that is fairly hypocritical. I'll see to changing it. It is kind of strange though, as it does what I need. Making a whole new icon seems to be unnecessary, but I'll try. I've redone the header, resized the bird illustration, and gotten rid of the top icons. What do you think? |
||
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) |
|
That Kid
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,371
|
But you ARE a blog designer. It doesn't matter what you use wordpress for, you're still doing the same thing when designing it. Just because you haven't seen something doesn't mean it exists. Technically a blog is a form of a cms, so it doesn't matter what you call yourself. |
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) | |
|
Doodler.
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 2,707
|
Quote:
But I'm assuming the text is all going to change he's still not fixed the spelling of technologies. |
|
|
![]() |
|