Web Design Forums

shwizle · 17-12-2007, 00:43

I know this is very basic, but I'm just learning flash.
This required an image mask, some motion and shape tweaning, and a stop action. Any thoughts?

.::ivan cash::.

Thanks,
Ivan

steveb · 17-12-2007, 01:05

It looks fine to me. It loads quickly and the photo gallery contents appear soon enough. And there's enough content to make it interesting without being overpowering.
Basic it might be, but it doesn't need more bells and whistles.

forbes · 17-12-2007, 04:56

its basic but sometimes flash is better like that..

Larixk · 17-12-2007, 05:17

it needs more fps

shwizle · 17-12-2007, 14:18

Quote:

Originally Posted by Larixk

it needs more fps

Switched from 12 FPS to 24.
Thanks for the input.

ahref · 17-12-2007, 15:50

its nice to see some fast loading flash that looks good sometimes

Liam · 17-12-2007, 16:35

Am i missing something?

Sorry but I dont really see the point of your animation, I much prefer the photograph without the fancy animation. I like the photograph and I dont think it needs this bit of flash. I would only use flash if added something that bit extra or you couldn't achieve the same result without the use of flash.

jcharnley · 17-12-2007, 18:15

flash should only be used in a case of a need of interactivity, like explaining something. (eg Howstuffworks "Picking Pin-and-tumbler Locks", showing a movie (eg youtube.com), or even music (myspace.com), .. but i wouldn't use it to show a picture.. great effect, looks nice, but imo, waste.

17-12-2007, 00:43	#1 (permalink)
shwizle Registered confUser Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: NY Posts: 372	My First Shot at Flash I know this is very basic, but I'm just learning flash. This required an image mask, some motion and shape tweaning, and a stop action. Any thoughts? .::ivan cash::. Thanks, Ivan __________________ Take a chance

17-12-2007, 01:05	#2 (permalink)
steveb 389 ppm and rising Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Järvenpää, Finland Posts: 4,431	It looks fine to me. It loads quickly and the photo gallery contents appear soon enough. And there's enough content to make it interesting without being overpowering. Basic it might be, but it doesn't need more bells and whistles. __________________ My free fonts www.utfi.net

17-12-2007, 05:17	#4 (permalink)
Larixk Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Utrecht, Netherlands Posts: 986	it needs more fps __________________

17-12-2007, 16:35	#7 (permalink)
Liam Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Manchester Posts: 597	Am i missing something? Sorry but I dont really see the point of your animation, I much prefer the photograph without the fancy animation. I like the photograph and I dont think it needs this bit of flash. I would only use flash if added something that bit extra or you couldn't achieve the same result without the use of flash. __________________ Flickr

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

17-12-2007, 04:56	#3 (permalink)
forbes Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Belfast Posts: 766	its basic but sometimes flash is better like that..

17-12-2007, 15:50	#6 (permalink)
ahref Registered User Join Date: Dec 2007 Posts: 20	its nice to see some fast loading flash that looks good sometimes

17-12-2007, 18:15	#8 (permalink)
jcharnley Registered User Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Denmark 4600 Posts: 82	flash should only be used in a case of a need of interactivity, like explaining something. (eg Howstuffworks "Picking Pin-and-tumbler Locks", showing a movie (eg youtube.com), or even music (myspace.com), .. but i wouldn't use it to show a picture.. great effect, looks nice, but imo, waste.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)