[Paul]

developed this site for a client. design was completly done by client.

link

your welcome to crit the design but honestly i don't care as i only devloped it. still working on the flash slideshow, but any thoughts on probs you have with the site whack them to me.

if any one can see the difference between the color of the image headers on each page and bg let me know. the cline tsaid that they noticed a difference so i change the container bg to an image, but i never saw the problem in the 1st place so can't tell if its fixed.

ta

[b v]

add a preloader in the gallery. at first I thought the next and prev arrows were broken.

[Paul]

adding that as i speak

[joey]

Originally Posted by b v

add a preloader in the gallery. at first I thought the next and prev arrows were broken.

I had the same reaction.

[steveb]

I see no difference in colour. The copy needs feeding through a spellchecker but that's not your problem.

[tutorialstuff]

I agree 100% about the pre-loader!

[cam]

the navigation spills onto a second line for me, looks messy

[Paul]

Originally Posted by cam

the navigation spills onto a second line for me, looks messy

what browser and OS?

[cam]

ubuntu/firefox. didn't check in xp

[Paul]

change it now, whats it like man?

edit: btw, was it just the nav or the whole thing you found messy?

ps: i really need to get linux to test

[cam]

Originally Posted by karloff

change it now, whats it like man?

edit: btw, was it just the nav or the whole thing you found messy?

ps: i really need to get linux to test

just the nav was messy, hasn't changed though?

should download ubuntu and burn it onto a CD - can use it as a LiveCD

[Paul]

downloading as we speak. i'll try test later.

ta

[Dirti]

oppertunity is spelt opportunity

[Paul]

didn't write the content, thats the clients job

[pat]

title, sub title, and surrounding white rectangle are all misaligned, looks shloppy.

[t3amBrian]

Gallery is slow.

Firefox OSX.
2.16ghz Core 2 Duo MacBook Pro.

[Paul]

Originally Posted by pat

title, sub title, and surrounding white rectangle are all misaligned, looks shloppy.

cheers pat, i agree the title, etc looks out of place but its designed to line up like that. if you see it in mozilla 2.0 (on XP) it is ment to look like that.

like i said i didn't design, only coded.


as for the speed, thats an easy fix which i'm dealing with right now.

cunt of a day, plasterer was in my flat doing work and fuking smacked a hole through my toilet wall into the close!!!!! fuking tosser

the above should be in the fuk off section but can't be arsed posting it


cam: got that CD but when i checked the site in ubuntu FF seemed fine to me. whats it like on your side? still fuked. if so any chance of a screenshot?

[sudzio]

Generally it doesnt look bad but I agree about the preloader.

[Paul]

Originally Posted by sudzio

Generally it doesnt look bad but I agree about the preloader.

there is a preloader on in ya nutter

[astheria]

Originally Posted by karloff

cheers pat, i agree the title, etc looks out of place but its designed to line up like that. if you see it in mozilla 2.0 (on XP) it is ment to look like that.

like i said i didn't design, only coded.

Even if you're not the designer you should've pushed back on that. It's something that would've taken you five minutes at most to advise them that things should line up, that misalignment alone makes it feel unprofessional to me.

Also, your buttons are extremely pixelated in the gallery (the prev/next buttons) draw them in Flash don't import from Photoshop for something that simple.

Lastly, I'm on a 6mb/ps line and even I was a tad annoyed at the wait time for photos. :/