| Home | Register | FAQ | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
I Ain't Losing Any Sleep™
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 5,235
|
uni project
Hi guys If you've got time can you have a quick shufty at my latest creation. It's a uni assignment. http://www.lifeofsmallbeer.co.uk/eimc/index.html It's all css for the layout/presentation - NN4 users will have to make do with the basic (but structured) version. The navigation buttons are CSS and I'm working on a way to preload the hover states at the moment, before you tell me! Still a few odds and sods to finish up but your comments will be appreciated. TIA Jamie That's fuckin' ingenious, if I understand it correctly. It's a Swiss fuckin' watch.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
I Call Shenanigans™
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Manchester, England.
Posts: 9,885
|
I like the design, nice colour scheme and good layout. The only problem I found was the top nav buttons - one looks like its out of place, see http://www.designerstalk.com/nav.gif to see what I mean. Im using a PC , win 2k, ie 6 and 1024 res. To me it looks like all the buttons should go accross the top. |
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Manchester
Posts: 991
|
Strawberry ice cream - nothing too flash but nice nevertheless. Checked it in Safari and found no display problems whatsoever. Andrew Parker
--------------------- (Apple PowerBook G4 1.67GHz / 1Gb RAM / OS X / Safari ) |
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
I Ain't Losing Any Sleep™
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 5,235
|
Cheers so far guys. Oli, I'm not too sure why that's happening - yep they're all meant to go along the top AND there's not meant to be the dashed underline underneath either! I'm using the same setup so it's confused me a little. I've tried something though - would you mind going back in and having another look for me? Cheers, J That's fuckin' ingenious, if I understand it correctly. It's a Swiss fuckin' watch.
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
i do lines
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Poland/Denmark
Posts: 3,227
|
Generally speaking, I like it. It's [i:cc9ab16f51]FAST[/i:cc9ab16f51] (<- I like it) I too get dashes under the links... Although not intensional - how do you do that? css? I didnt know it was possible My only comment would be the picture... Generally speaking it's nice but personally I think it's just too much in ya face! Basically it's too big. The plug looks huge even on 1280x1024... I would scale it down a bit and maybe turn it monochrome to get a more 'clinical' look... gray to white gradient-map maybe...? But good job finding a plug that actually looks the same all over Europe ...
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
I Call Shenanigans™
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Manchester, England.
Posts: 9,885
|
http://www.designerstalk.com/nav.gif - updated. The link is still in the wrong place but the dashes are gone now, the text links still have a dashed line underneath - is this intentional ? |
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
I Ain't Losing Any Sleep™
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 5,235
|
OK I think I got it this time! The problem *should* be fixed. The dashed lines under text links is intentional, under the image links was not. Cheers for the help. Jamie That's fuckin' ingenious, if I understand it correctly. It's a Swiss fuckin' watch.
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Dr. Lucien Sanchez
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 5,638
|
Hi smallbeer, I like your site. I rooted around in your css and if you change #navbar ul li a in sophisticated.css from this: [code:1:3d16f3092b]width: 138px; /* false value for IE4-5.x/Win. */[/code:1:3d16f3092b] to this... [code:1:3d16f3092b]width: 128px; /* false value for IE4-5.x/Win. */[/code:1:3d16f3092b] Everything should work fine in ie. (its line #226) |
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Barney army!
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London
Posts: 696
|
I like it very much - nice one! Luke Redpath .::. Software Engineer .::. Reevoo - Real Reviews From Real Customers
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
I Ain't Losing Any Sleep™
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 5,235
|
Cheers for the comments guys. Dorian, I know what you mean about the header images. I just thought they were a nice contrast against the otherwise text based site. Stickman thanks for looking at it for me. I haven't been able to check that it works yet but it shouldn't, should it!? I mean they are 98px wide, with 30px left padding and a left margin of 10px. That's 138px. The problem was that they all needed the left margin to create the space between the buttons 'cept for the "home" button which had margin: 0. I thought it was that that was messing things up. I'll go to uni and get it sorted on the test machines. Cheers again Jamie That's fuckin' ingenious, if I understand it correctly. It's a Swiss fuckin' watch.
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Dr. Lucien Sanchez
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 5,638
|
From what I could see, your maths was/is right. But try telling that to microsoft. What has happened to me before is that ie has included padding into the width of the element, but not margins. I haven't a clue why it sometimes does this and it seems to be applied completely at random. I've just looked and seen you've changed the width to 128 now anyway. |
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) |
|
Hey Alan, nice rope!
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Cuntoff
Posts: 770
|
The smallbeer site looks very similar to http://www.modecreative.com/ Don't get sand on your ice cream...
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) |
|
I Ain't Losing Any Sleep™
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 5,235
|
[quote:863982d6d4="mark"]The smallbeer site looks very similar to http://www.modecreative.com/[/quote:863982d6d4] Yeah it was the inspiration. That's fuckin' ingenious, if I understand it correctly. It's a Swiss fuckin' watch.
|
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) |
|
I Ain't Losing Any Sleep™
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 5,235
|
If you say so mate. Like I said mode creative was the inspiration. I didn't realise how 'fine the line' was until I'd finished. If it had been a commercial project I'd have thought twice, more than twice. Jamie That's fuckin' ingenious, if I understand it correctly. It's a Swiss fuckin' watch.
|
|
![]() |