| Home | Register | FAQ | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
d4interactive
|
Design opinions on my site
Hi all, I have recently overhauled my site, trying to get it as clean, professional and standards compliant as possible (phew!). Let me know what you think http://www.webdesigncompany.co.za |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
(at first glance) looks like a holder page for a domain that has not been registered yet. Background is different on the home page from the rest of the site. I think a better color scheem would do a lot for your site. Bad header / ad placement, I don't like how the header shares the same block as the ads/ google sitemaps thing. |
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Keep it foolish yeah?
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Not Leeds
Posts: 579
|
i can't be arsed with css. i couldn't care less if it validates or not, it's just uninspired and, for want of a better word, shit. sorry, but the net is littered with joe-fucking-average sites, some are done in css, some aren't - even if they're made using the hair and sweat of 1,000 virgins, if they look boring and shit, then they are. i'm bored to tears with 'look at my awesome and clean looking site - done in css' - only to click and it be the same uninspired cock-shit as all the rest. |
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Rough Creep Arse™
|
How far should good/interesting/different/original design extend to web sites? Should ALL web sites be of an original design? I think it needs putting into perspective a little. I suppose sites/companies which are promoting themselves as new and original and selling a design service should be doing more than rehashing the same old two column centred site but I don't think CSS is exactly to blame for this. Lots of sites have demonstrated new and interesting design techniques and are fully standards compliant to boot. |
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Keep it foolish yeah?
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Not Leeds
Posts: 579
|
aye. i'm not slagging css - it's not my field - it just bores the twat off me when creatives produce sites and think by adding 'it's made using css' that means it's great. Obviously the site should reflect the content and fit the brief blah blah blah - but if it's a creative's site or could/should be done in a creative way, i'd rather see that than some boring arse with 'css' tattoed on it. |
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) | |
|
fucksocks™
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: in the boosh
Posts: 1,632
|
Quote:
oh I don't know! I was all set to copy his entire site code and tout it as my own. damn copyscape has folied me again |
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) |
|
Unregistered user
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 312
|
I don't think the news really has a place on this site. Maybe make your own news? I think the text needs to be darker. Try #003366 or something similar. Also add some more colour. Get rid of the Google and Photo banner and make a good appealing banner for your company/yourself. The D4 INTERACTIVE logo at the top right could really make a nice banner. For the record, I love CSS but agree that just because a site's done in CSS doesn't make it the Bee's knees. CSS should be viewed as a good design aid that produces well seperated presentation and code - you know the rest of that story. It takes skill to make a site look good whatever you use. |
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) | |
|
vague™
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 5,595
|
Quote:
Very true. CSS can have a negative impact on sites in design terms, particularly if you're both designing & developing as the constraints are well known to you and may adversely affect you (unconsciously) when you're designing. Has happened to me in the past |
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) |
|
volkswagen yellow & gold
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: london, england.
Posts: 6,147
|
constraints? i thought we were over that now? i've not seen a design in a while that couldn't be built in complaint xhtml. i still see functionality flaws from 'creatives'. fucking print monkeys. |
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,340
|
Quote:
But if you're referring to people who would give you a job in a design firm, then you're right. |
|
|
![]() |