Reply LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-02-2006, 06:03   #1 (permalink)
sub
Shitcasket™
 
sub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Brighton
Posts: 4,860
Send a message via MSN to sub Send a message via Skype™ to sub
Another search engine spamming question.

Would Javascript, Flash and browser redirection be classified as search engine spamming? ie Alternative content being used if any of these critea are met or Javascript fails?
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2006, 10:29   #2 (permalink)
stickmus
hmmm...
 
stickmus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Yorkuk
Posts: 2,127
Search engines don't do javascript do they?
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2006, 11:05   #3 (permalink)
sub
Shitcasket™
 
sub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Brighton
Posts: 4,860
Send a message via MSN to sub Send a message via Skype™ to sub
As far as I know they don't, but if I use alternative content on the page where the Javascript redirection resides is this classed as SE spamming?
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2006, 11:11   #4 (permalink)
Stickman
Dr. Lucien Sanchez
 
Stickman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 5,572
I think so.

You should read cam's bmw thread.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2006, 11:18   #5 (permalink)
sub
Shitcasket™
 
sub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Brighton
Posts: 4,860
Send a message via MSN to sub Send a message via Skype™ to sub
Hmmm. Bugger.
So any kind of user detection script is essentially spamming if content is supplied for non-javascript enabled browsers?
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2006, 12:27   #6 (permalink)
cam
vague™
 
cam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 5,595
Quote:
Originally Posted by subcircle
Hmmm. Bugger.
So any kind of user detection script is essentially spamming if content is supplied for non-javascript enabled browsers?

Only if you're supplying blatant doorway page spam like bmw were. The redirect isn't the problem, it's the fact they were supplying different (useless, keyword heavy) content to SE spiders than they were to real visitors.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2006, 00:19   #7 (permalink)
pgo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,340
Quote:
Originally Posted by cam
Only if you're supplying blatant doorway page spam like bmw were. The redirect isn't the problem, it's the fact they were supplying different (useless, keyword heavy) content to SE spiders than they were to real visitors.
I.e. spiders got one set of content, users got another - thereby misleading the spiders and incurring The Wrath of Google (patent pending).
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2006, 05:38   #8 (permalink)
sub
Shitcasket™
 
sub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Brighton
Posts: 4,860
Send a message via MSN to sub Send a message via Skype™ to sub
Cheers all. Thanks for the advise
  Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Contact Us - Web Design Forums - Archive - Top
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8