Web Design Forums

cam · 31-05-2005, 08:46

http://www.silmonia.com/2005/index.html

Narate · 31-05-2005, 10:26

yeh, some amazing shots in there,

I like

emil · 31-05-2005, 10:49

me too

Mr Fred · 31-05-2005, 10:57

I took some great photos this weekend.

cam · 31-05-2005, 11:10

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr Mik

I took some great photos this weekend.

let's see

Mr Fred · 31-05-2005, 11:26

will post soon.

Narate · 31-05-2005, 11:56

I took a picture of the biggest 'daddy long legs' I have ever seen.

lucidcreations · 31-05-2005, 12:17

nice gallary

stitch · 31-05-2005, 15:16

check out ye rin mok, some spot on stuff,, has that hiromix and terry richardson stlye without the nakedness.

http://www.yerinmok.com/3/index.htm

pgo · 31-05-2005, 23:08

Really like the first one - with the different nations/locations...

Guess all these photography sites make one remember that all that's required to be a good photographer is being able to take well-framed (non-symmetrical) shots of people looking down and brooding.

I'm only joking, but you really notice that people - especially young people - think they have to take somber pictures of homeless people, crack whores, half-naked/naked women, or brooding people. The perception seems to be that it's "serious" and "arty". It's nonsense if you ask me.

One of my old teachers said that photography was for people who can't draw...and he was right - most of those photo kids couldn't draw their way out of a paper bag, but they could take lovely pictures.

Anyway, enough of my semi-anti-photography rant. No offense intended to photographers.

lucidcreations · 01-06-2005, 05:50

oooooohhhh

stitch · 02-06-2005, 17:47

sorry thats just laim, its just moved on, like it should have,, if you want a reason to dislike photography at least have a good one,, read "hockney on art",, he raises some really good points about the differences between photography and painting.. he seems to be an honest artist,, rare to find.

cam · 03-06-2005, 04:43

Quote:

Originally Posted by stitch

check out ye rin mok, some spot on stuff,, has that hiromix and terry richardson stlye without the nakedness.

http://www.yerinmok.com/3/index.htm

some nice shots there, but the majority of it doesn't really speak to me

31-05-2005, 08:46	#1 (permalink)
cam vague™ Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Glasgow Posts: 5,193	Lovely photography http://www.silmonia.com/2005/index.html __________________ Random goodness at The Blog™

31-05-2005, 12:17	#8 (permalink)
lucidcreations Part of the 3 out of 4 Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: cheshire Posts: 2,081	nice gallary __________________ Jase

01-06-2005, 05:50	#11 (permalink)
lucidcreations Part of the 3 out of 4 Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: cheshire Posts: 2,081	oooooohhhh __________________ Jase

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

31-05-2005, 10:26	#2 (permalink)
Narate Royalty™ Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Manchester (UK) Posts: 3,211	yeh, some amazing shots in there, I like

31-05-2005, 10:49	#3 (permalink)
emil dt immigrant Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Bucharest - Romania Posts: 6,492	me too

31-05-2005, 10:57	#4 (permalink)
Mr Fred Magazines™ Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Glasgow.. Posts: 11,275	I took some great photos this weekend.

31-05-2005, 11:26	#6 (permalink)
Mr Fred Magazines™ Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Glasgow.. Posts: 11,275	will post soon.

31-05-2005, 11:56	#7 (permalink)
Narate Royalty™ Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Manchester (UK) Posts: 3,211	I took a picture of the biggest 'daddy long legs' I have ever seen.

31-05-2005, 15:16	#9 (permalink)
stitch Registered User Join Date: May 2005 Location: brighton uk Posts: 48	check out ye rin mok, some spot on stuff,, has that hiromix and terry richardson stlye without the nakedness. http://www.yerinmok.com/3/index.htm

31-05-2005, 23:08	#10 (permalink)
pgo i'm done, son Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 12,262	Really like the first one - with the different nations/locations... Guess all these photography sites make one remember that all that's required to be a good photographer is being able to take well-framed (non-symmetrical) shots of people looking down and brooding. I'm only joking, but you really notice that people - especially young people - think they have to take somber pictures of homeless people, crack whores, half-naked/naked women, or brooding people. The perception seems to be that it's "serious" and "arty". It's nonsense if you ask me. One of my old teachers said that photography was for people who can't draw...and he was right - most of those photo kids couldn't draw their way out of a paper bag, but they could take lovely pictures. Anyway, enough of my semi-anti-photography rant. No offense intended to photographers.

02-06-2005, 17:47	#12 (permalink)
stitch Registered User Join Date: May 2005 Location: brighton uk Posts: 48	sorry thats just laim, its just moved on, like it should have,, if you want a reason to dislike photography at least have a good one,, read "hockney on art",, he raises some really good points about the differences between photography and painting.. he seems to be an honest artist,, rare to find.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)