| Home | Register | FAQ | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
™
|
I know that.. I meant physically haha. I was gonna get the G5 but every review I read said the G3 was better, it had a far superior lens?? I had to pay a lot for it because it's long out of production. Now they've probably improved it.. and put mine to shame. |
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Royalty™
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Manchester (UK)
Posts: 3,211
|
Ha cant believe I typed that, must of been tired. Didnt know about that, the only reason I got that one because I spoke to some photographer and he said he had recently used the G5 and he was very impressed by its capabilities. It has been superseeded now by the G6. Dont understand how an updated version of a camera would have such a downgraded lense though. Unless Canon were cutting back. |
|
![]() |