| Home | Register | FAQ | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 4
|
I have recently bought Canon EOS 300D with 18-55lens. I have a 75-300is usm on order (out of stock..!!!) plus I want to go macro...good clear close ups of flowers,nature stuff etc. any suggestions from experience what lens would suit? am bit of camera virgin,easily confused so talk basic please!!!! Have |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Part of the 3 out of 4
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: cheshire
Posts: 2,081
|
i just bought the Canon 300D kit with 18 -55mm lens as well. I got mine when i was in Antigua and mangaed to get a bit of deal. I only paid about £600 with kit and 256mb card, not bad. The camera kicks ass! jane g i've got the same lens on order as well 75 - 300 mm, but non IS version. Cos my camera is the american verison its the Digital Rebel and dont know if you knew there is a site by Canon advertised with my camera that shows you how to use every bit of it in a priactical way not just quoting the manual. Its helped me loads as this is my first SLR. http://www.photoworkshop.com/canon/rick_sammon.html Jase
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 4
|
Hi :-) yeah, mine is rebel too. got from Canada (via Ebay)for £650 inc all postage. had extras inc 256mem card (3 batteries,2chargers??!) thnx for canon site..will read up! my 75-300 lens is out of stock..so impatiently waiting!!aaahhh bugger!! good price tho, so will hang on 7dayshop.com V. pleased with camera..had some good results..still lot to learn tho..experiment alot!!You use ur camera for work or pleasure? i like ur homepage,by the way!! different,impressive. Jane Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Part of the 3 out of 4
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: cheshire
Posts: 2,081
|
camera is for work and pleasure, trying to save myself some money by not forking out on so much print res stock art. My site is about 2yrs old and well out of date, loads missing. I also need to get my photography portfolio up there. Jase
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 4
|
HI :-) so HOW tricky?? why? I have 18-55 lens at mo,and am waiting for 70-300is. would filter be ok with them tho??what dyou use it on? Just want to play with new stuff and nothing here!!!:-( like ur pics..i have done lot of still water ..waterfalls closeup,flowers closeup..want to get CLOSER!! Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
The shots on my website were taken with the Canon A70 which has a built in macro mode were u can get about 5cm away from the subject. I use the Closeup Filter +4 on my Canon 10D but I don't have any examples online. However, I know someone who does. http://sh1ft.org/shutterbug/archives/000274.html http://sh1ft.org/shutterbug/archives/000227.html The tulips are amazing and I have the same equipment. When I say tricky, its essentially like putting a pair of glasses infront of your camera. You need to be the perfect distance away to get the subject you want in focus. It is tricky, but it saves you about £250 |
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
Yer thats exactly it |
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Bulgaria
Posts: 9
|
Take a look at http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/cont...=148526&is=USA It's a Sigma 105/2.8 Macro. A friend of mine has this lens and I've had the opportunity to use it a couple of times. It's incredible! Solid build, works smooth as a Rolex and is incredibly sharp. Tha Macro mode is 1:1. And it's only $369 at B&H. I have a 18-55, a 50/1.8II and a 90-300USM. The Sigma is better in all respects. |
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) | |
|
Part of the 3 out of 4
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: cheshire
Posts: 2,081
|
Quote:
Nice one, it turned out REALLY well. Jase
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: London|Paris|New York|Tokyo
Posts: 21
|
Macro Options
I would suggest going for some extension tubes rather than getting a new lense, this way you can turn all your lenses into macro lenses. Just make sure if you're using af to get an extension tube with CPU contacts. you're probably gonna lost one or two stops, you would do so with one of those cheap close up filters too, so depending on how fast your lense is this migth be an option. The other 'dirt cheap' and slightly hazardous option for a dSLR is to take your lense off turn it around and hold it up against your camera body and take your photos like that... it works but remember you're not using film so any dust getting on your ccd will be a problem... this method is popular with photo students as it costs nothing! The disadvatange is that you have to set it on manual mode and the aperture ring is on the other side of the lense so you'll be working at the widest aperture...kinda... hope this helps... a..// |
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
El Presidente
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 106
|
If you can swing it, go for the MP-E macro from Canon F1.4 and will do anywhere between 1x to 5x real life zoom (5x will fill at 35mm frame with a grain of rice from 1 foot, and will focus as close as 1 inch). They only run, oh, about a million and a half bucks!!! No, they are expensive though, really expensive, but probably worth every friggin penny. Also, and I don't know for sure, but I am looking... You might be able to get an inverter ring for a Canon (I know you can for a nikon). It will allow you to invert a zoom lens, and use it as a macro. The only problem is you will have to find and all manual lens. That should be hard, because it can be any mount, since it would be inverted anyways... If you find this^ let me know what make it is, so I can get one too. ANd if I find it, I'll leave a little note here B5 |
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) |
|
El Presidente
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 106
|
http://www.alphaphoto.net/ Really, really nice macros |
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
|
Tamron have made a 90mm macro for years in various mounts and it has rightly attained legendary status. I have a newer f.2.8 (older ones were f2.5) and it is outrageously good. It's no portrait lens - resolves far too much detail and is quite harsh (and not quite fast enough) but it's the most outstanding macro lens... Close-up filters are keen, but non macro lenses are not corrected for such close distances and do not have very flat fields at those distances. But for just messing around, sure, do it. |
|
![]() |