| Home | Register | FAQ | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| DesignersTalk > PhotoContest: November |
| View Poll Results: What will be the subject of the November contest? | |||
| Old & New |
|
3 | 13.64% |
| Release! |
|
0 | 0% |
| Urban Culture |
|
5 | 22.73% |
| Technique |
|
1 | 4.55% |
| Emotions |
|
4 | 18.18% |
| Portrait Photography |
|
7 | 31.82% |
| Abstract |
|
0 | 0% |
| Communication |
|
1 | 4.55% |
| Product Photography |
|
1 | 4.55% |
| Voters: 22. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#41 (permalink) | |
|
Black & Proud
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 3,265
|
Quote:
completely agree. Very rarely do I take a picture and do nothing to it - all my internal camera settings are set to zero (sharpness, contrast etc etc) and I do all my adjustments in photoshop: exposure and white balance correction when converting from RAW, then levels, colour correction, sharpening (USM or Intellisharpen), any noise reduction and then finally tweak the saturation (sometimes a Digital Velvia action) to get the results I want. I see little point in sqabbling over what we can and can't do to an image - just get on with the competition and let people decide what technique is best for them. Why not give people a bit of creative freedom and let them explain what they have or haven't done to their submitted entry - it'll be good to see what people have done to achieve the end result. We might even learn something! Quite how a 'no photoshop' rule can be policed, i've no idea. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#43 (permalink) | |
|
vague™
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 5,337
|
Quote:
latecomer to this thread, but completely agree with tomson let's get the contest going and be done with it |
|
|
|
|
#44 (permalink) |
|
Part of the 3 out of 4
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: cheshire
Posts: 2,081
|
Looks like portraiture is winning at the moment. This site is a nice fashion portraiture gallery. All shots were taken on a Canon 300D with 50mm f1.8. All the same gear as me, but my pics dont look like that so mine must be broke http://www.gleitfoto.dk/ Jase
|
|
|
|
#50 (permalink) |
|
gulp!
|
sorry to bring it back up agian and ruin the camera convo, but Forever is your last say on the photoshop rule final? i had a thought, perhaps all entrants are required to upload the original + the touch up. if it is found that the touch up is nowhere near what the original photo's "purpose" then they're kicked? |
|
|
|
#51 (permalink) |
|
KuYuCHi
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Europe, (Maastricht)
Posts: 113
|
About the photoshop limitations. Of course of everyone agrees on using adjusting features, such as contrast, brightness, sharpness etc. then I won't tell that we are not supposed to. It is obvious that you are allowed to convert RAW pictures into jpegs lol. I just thought that it would be more interesting to post your pictures as clean s they are. Straight from the camera without modifications. But at the end, who am I? Happy photographing, I think the next theme will be portrait.. p.s. cropping is allright of course, but I am still not sure about adjusting brightness etc. you should do that rightaway with your camera options. This is by the way a DIGIcam contest, so the old-fashioned options of adjusting stuff in the dark room are not in discussion. |
|
|
|
#52 (permalink) |
|
KuYuCHi
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Europe, (Maastricht)
Posts: 113
|
But as this photo contest is set up as a try-out, it is of course influencable. All suggestions are welcome, we need this contest to evolve itself. So if we are doing this for a few months then we might consider to rewrite the regulations. |
|
|
|
#53 (permalink) | |
|
Part of the 3 out of 4
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: cheshire
Posts: 2,081
|
Quote:
Tomson, how you finding that lens? I was gonna get one this week, but I've read mixed reports about its sharpness until you get to about f8 and stay in between 35 to 100mm ish. Jase
|
|
|
|
|
#56 (permalink) | |
|
Black & Proud
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 3,265
|
Quote:
Not had a great deal of time to play with it yet to be honest. Hopefully going to take it out and snap a few shots of the fireworks this weekend - the IS should come in handy there. I've read loads of different views on the lens - the majority of them seem to be positive but it definitely isn't the sharpest lens out there (i'd have gone for a Tamron 28-75DI if sharpness was my main concern) but for me the range and the low light capabilities of the image stabiliser more than make up for it. I wanted a walk-around lens and narrowed it down to a Sigma 24-135 f2.8, a Sigma 18-125 DC and the Canon. The DC i wasn't overly impressed with (vingetting, whining and fairly slow focusing). Has a really useful range on a dSLR though, and it very light. The other Sigma I really liked (especially being f2.8) but the USM and the IS of the Canon did it for me in the end. Its a tad on the heavy side tho. |
|
|
|
|
#57 (permalink) | |
|
unusual suspect ™
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: DE, USA
Posts: 2,780
|
Quote:
Glad that's not just me |
|
|
![]() |