| Home | Register | FAQ | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
person
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 143
|
Screen resolutions for wallpapers?
What sizes do I leave out (or include) these days? So far I've included: 800x600, 1024x768, 1280x1024. But after those it gets kind of iffy. 1600x1200, 2560x1600, 1440x900???? There's too many. Any ideas? I'm stumped. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
389 ppm and rising
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Järvenpää, Finland
Posts: 4,942
|
Those aren't resolutions. Those are sizes. There is an important difference and you should understand it if you're doing computer graphics. I do my wallpapers 1024x768 pixels at 72 dpi resolution. My free fonts www.utfi.net
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Will work for Marmite
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Sapporo, Japan
Posts: 573
|
To be fair, I think the word resolution has been used like this for years -certainly enough to enter the common parlance. Even monitor manufacturers use it to describe their products. Take this for example from the Dell website: "Current high-resolution LCDs available on Dell notebook computers can display resolutions as high as 1600 x 1200 on a 14.1- or 15-inch screen and 1920 x 1200 on a 15.4-inch screen." |
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
389 ppm and rising
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Järvenpää, Finland
Posts: 4,942
|
Well, to be fair, you're absolutely correct that the word has been used that way for years. Wrongly. It makes no difference what you call anything, of course. Like Humpty-Dumpty, a word means whatever you decide it means. I should say that the confusion between size and resolution causes major fuck-ups in the printing industry and I've been a victim of it too often to feel very lenient about it! My free fonts www.utfi.net
|
|
![]() |