| Home | Register | FAQ | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Now Freelance!
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Warrington, UK
Posts: 476
|
doesn't really do it for a logo. have a look here LogoPond - Identity Inspiration for some inspiration. |
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
+
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Tropical Networks
Posts: 1,584
|
Quote:
Which idea ? thats the problem with your logo there is no idea behind it. You could be a DJ, or a shoe brand or whatever. What in that logo tells me you're a photographer ? At least : what does it tell on your personality ? nothing good really. If you don't know how to design find a nice script font, with a little work, it can be a kind of signature, more personal than your modern/techno crap font. sorry if I'm rude. Fonts are like cologne: A bad choice speaks louder than a good one. Justin Feinstein
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Czech Republic
Posts: 39
|
Quote:
The left part is very confusing. I like that font generally. Each logo should look according to usage. The logo looks convinient for yang people on a website... |
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
389 ppm and rising
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Järvenpää, Finland
Posts: 4,942
|
Some more recent logo examples Eulda - The European Logo Design Annual 2007 I find little wrong with the second logo. I wouldn't choose that font for myself but I cam imagine that it might look quite good on a minimalist website. It also works fine on stationery but you need to remember that those thin lines will disappear if the logo is reproduced too small. It's OK to not be fashionable if your work is still precise and careful! |
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
goober :-)
|
I'm personally not keen on the look of it either. I'm not sure that the sharp, angular nature of it really works with the fact that you deal with models. Maybe something more flowing would work better for you? However, as steveb has said, it should work ok printed, as long as you dont reduce it too much. David |
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
|
A logo is a representation of your business. If your business is model photography it needs to reflect that. This logo does not. As you mentioned that graphic design is not your field why not spend a few dollars to get a professionally designed logo from a designer knowledgeable in logo design. The money you spend on a professionally designed logo will be a good investment for your business. |
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Copenhagen
Posts: 12
|
Thanks for the feedback, my business is photography, but edgemodels is a business that i'm helping my girlfriend to start up, and at the moment the money are very limited, otherwise we would have hired a designer. The idea of using a "sharp square font" was to reflect a "sharp edgy name", but maybe i am the only one, who could see the connection. |
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Stoke on Trent
Posts: 495
|
Well I think that if you are not a designer and you can't afford a designer, you should listen and take advise from designers in this site. I personally think the font is dreadful, if you want sharp square font... how about Eurostile? I think perhaps you would incorporate a stilorette of a model in the type and play around with colour. |
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) |
|
+
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Tropical Networks
Posts: 1,584
|
green squares, now rounded purple. man, you must have been thinking for a loooong time on what defines your identity. You are NOT designing a logo, you are throwing type* and color on screen, hoping it will make something magic. Please, listen to my advice. Shut down your computer, brew a coffee, think. Then, take a pen and paper and make a list of everything that makes you/yourjob/your project special. Then, come back for help. -- *At least it's not Eurostile. Fonts are like cologne: A bad choice speaks louder than a good one. Justin Feinstein
|
|
![]() |