| Home | Register | FAQ | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 53
|
cross-platform color problems...
site: http://s92622896.onlinehome.us/bbc/beuteltest/ Problem: The header image's colors. It all looks fine in IE and FF on a PC, but when I checked it on a friend's Mac with Safari, it rendered like this: ![]() Apparently the colors aren't web safe. I thought this quit being a problem in 1996 once everyone replaced their 256-color monitors? The header image was originally a PNG, but due to IE's crap PNG gamma rendering, I switched it to JPG, which was working just fine until I Mac'd it. Anyone have any suggestions for making it work? What am I doing wrong? |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
NeverFuckWithoutaRubber
|
i dont think it has anything to do with the browser more than it has something to do with the monitor its being displayed on. #22313a (Hex of the outside color) (#23313a) Hex of the color inside color (Darker color) . I took a prnt screen and checked the colors and that what it came out to. Change the background color of the image to #22313a and it should work because its of a little but a little on a monitor with different color settings may make a big difference. |
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 53
|
In Photoshop the image's background is #22313A, just like the rest of the header, but when I save it, it converts it to #23313A. I tried saving the jpeg header image a number of different ways and it still did the same thing every time. Am I doing something wrong, or is it just a problem with the compression that I have no control over? For now I decided just to change the header background to #23313A to match the image... but if that makes the whole header the darker color when viewed on a Mac, I would really prefer to have it all the lighter color. (Incredible how much difference that one number is making!) Any pointers on how to get the jpeg to do what I want? |
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
i do lines
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Poland/Denmark
Posts: 3,088
|
Quote:
but h is right - your image should be something like this: (you ought to recreate it yourself though - I worked with a JPG - it's not really advisable to reoptimise this way...) besides - a gif in this case is about 5 times smaller in file size! ...
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
i do lines
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Poland/Denmark
Posts: 3,088
|
Quote:
run your png's through png crush and it will display just fine across browsers. ...
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Fucking Awesome
|
that image should be a gif anyway, it's not a photo and only has a couple flat colors (run it with 8-16 colors and it'll be super small and load quickly too). Then you won't run into as many problems with the background as you can make it transparent. |
|
![]() |