| Home | Register | FAQ | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
your opinions...
... on when to use _ blank and open a link in a new window. I am working on a client’s page and I have always practiced _blank when I am going to a different domain (completely different site). I cannot convince the client do let me do so, because they think it looks like "spam" or a pop up. I am trying to explain that is not the case when someone clicks on a link the can expect a reaction, whether that is going to a new page or opening a new window. What do you all do/ think. Thanks Last edited by d3mcfadden : 14-09-2005 at 22:39. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
interesting... |
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Ur mother's ur brother?
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 913
|
it just annoys me when links to alternate domains dont open in a new window or tab. surely most businesses would prefer that visitors didn't leave their site that's a personal opinion though, rather than a 'best practice' piece of advice ::: TC Magazine :::
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
knocking heads
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,930
|
personally i just click a link with the scroll wheel which opens the page in a new tab in firefox, but obviously your visitors wont do that as a rule - i find that opening in a new window to external sites is best as it not only lets the visitor know they are going to a different site, but also means they dont have to click back 500 times if they want to return to your site after browsing the other one |
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
That's my thinking exactly, you could possibably loose your user if you take them off your site. I guess there are two sides to this argument, both valid. |
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,358
|
Quote:
According to most usability/accessibility studies, breaking the back button by opening a new window impedes the user's ability to navigate - as most people use the logical "Back" button to go "back". Also, as Transmogrify said, W3C is trying to rid us of target="_blank" - it's not only deprecated in XHTML 1.1, but also in XHTML 1.0 Strict. |
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Arf arf
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Bath, England
Posts: 31
|
I agree. I prefer to click a link that opens in a new window because it is easy to return back to where I started. Plus, the benefit for your client is that their site does not get 'lost' - it remains there to be seen by the viewer. |
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 75
|
I saw a thing recently where some standards head had used a little bit of java in a link beside the main links on his site to allow users to pop open a seperate window if they wanted the links to open in blanks. Anyone know what I'mma talking about? |
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) |
|
Ur mother's ur brother?
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 913
|
i agree that the user/customer is the person who should be kept in mind but i really do think that most people prefer links that go to a separate domain to pop up in a new window. i cant find the scrollwheel on my mac mouse ::: TC Magazine :::
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) |
|
turd 2.0
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Right on your tit end
Posts: 1,168
|
I prefer a new window to open. I hate it when you assume that a link has opened in a new window and end up closing your whole browser by mistake (trying to get back to where you linked from). Best practice my arse! |
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bristol
Posts: 3,283
|
Quote:
|
|
|
![]() |