| Home | Register | FAQ | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|
|
|
#22 (permalink) |
|
tech house dj
Join Date: May 2008
Location: riyadh, saudi arabia
Posts: 30
|
i had a macbook, gf had a macbookpro. same specs - 2.2 c2d, 4gb ram. i traded her and apart from the screen i didnt notice any difference. everyday at work i have running simultaneously: - ps or dw - eclipse - windows server 2003 virtual machine - ibm portal server on the win vm (2gb minimum requirement) - web browser(s) - usually flock and they run like a dream. i'm really impressed with the power. bottom line, macbook would be fine unless you need the higher res screen - but it will still be cheaper if you buy a nice 20" lcd + macbook. |
|
|
|
#23 (permalink) |
|
#T1M3S!
Join Date: May 2008
Location: in an visionary world
Posts: 11
|
As i write this post on one. The macbook's speed aint a issue. The only issue for me is the screen size. If you plan to do real work on it, you may want to look at an second screen besides it, or an macbook pro 17inch. My main workstation uses an bigger screen which (not apple) is more pleasant to work. If you really need that portability look at the Macbook pro, if you need real workpower maybe an imac is more your go? |
|
|
|
#28 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 34
|
I used a Macbook with CS3 for a bit, but found it slowed to a crawl if I was doing much. I finally upgraded to a MBP and I now run a 28" monitor and never get a slow down with photoshop/indesign/illustrator open and running Lightroom (I'm a photographer). Its not a bad piece of kit though. |
|
![]() |