Web Design Forums

Bill Posters · 23-04-2004, 11:53

Was planning on getting a couple of USB>bluetooth adapters to use with my new bluetooth-enabled printer (Epson R300).
Not being a techy guy, I'd assumed that given that there are USB2>Bluetooth adapter available Bluetooth would be at least as fast as USB1.

Just spoken to a guy in a local pooter shop who stated that sending print files typical of SoHo design setups is going to be painfully slow with bluetooth.
He said that I'd be much better off sticking with USB1 cables.

Is this true?
Would printing via bluetooth (just across a room) be painfully slow?

Anyone with experience of bluetooth and/or specifically printing from a pooter to a desktop printer (inkjet, fwiw™) via bluetooth?

tia

tomson · 23-04-2004, 12:17

Why do you want to use bluetooth if its just across a room?

Bill Posters · 23-04-2004, 12:20

It's preferable to running a 10m daisy-chain of usb cables around the edge of the room - I would have thought.

oli · 23-04-2004, 12:23

Setup a wireless lan, its pretty easy :
http://www.wi-fiplanet.com/tutorials...le.php/3328001

Bill Posters · 23-04-2004, 12:32

A WiFi Lan setup (print server presumably with an additional access point) looks like overkill given that I only want to reach one printer on the other side of the room.

Stickman · 23-04-2004, 12:35

Move the printer nearer?

tomson · 23-04-2004, 12:38

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bill Posters

It's preferable to running a 10m daisy-chain of usb cables around the edge of the room - I would have thought.

I guess.

Just wondered really as I'm wanting to rearrange my inkjet/laser/mac setup and am probably gonna run cables under the floor. Wondered if there was a specific reason for using bluetoof.

sleepingfish · 23-04-2004, 12:45

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stickman

Move the printer nearer?

Don't be silly.

Move the Mac nearer.

Bill Posters · 23-04-2004, 13:02

Just got a straight answer to my question at t'other place.
Sorted.

(ooh, get me)

Cheers, Oli.

Stickman · 23-04-2004, 13:04

Lazy bugger - you could have googled the speeds if that's all you were after.

tomson · 23-04-2004, 13:08

cables it is then

Bill Posters · 23-04-2004, 13:32

More than simply comp[aring the speeds, I was wondering if anyone used to printing via bluetooth could vouch for the perceived lag of using bluetooth over usb cable.
i.e. did it really feel slow?

The R300 printer will only be used for presentation prints so won't be getting a constant stream of prints to handle. Just as and when necessary.

In the absence of experience, I'll probably default to basing the decision on actual speed.

So… next question…

What's the effective limit to which you can daisy-chain usb cables?
I'd heard that no more than two was recommended (for one reason or another), but that was a bloke from Dixons, so…
(I've not seen a usb cable longer than 3meters on my various snooping around on and offline)

tia again

tomson · 23-04-2004, 13:42

how about http://www.homestead.co.uk/usb444.htm

Bill Posters · 24-04-2004, 05:08

bingo.
I've not heard of 'active repeater' cables. Perfick.

cheers, old bean.

Foopers · 08-01-2008, 18:53

it is unbelievably slow unless you are just printing simple text documents. I have just been printing out some photos and went off for dinner for an hour or so and came back to find the tenth one just finishing!

cocknose · 08-01-2008, 19:00

2004!!!!!

proc355 · 10-01-2008, 02:13

man, bluetooth is slow

23-04-2004, 11:53	#1 (permalink)
Bill Posters trouble free and loverlee Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: YooKay Posts: 2,962	Pooter > printer via bluetooth. Painfully slow? Was planning on getting a couple of USB>bluetooth adapters to use with my new bluetooth-enabled printer (Epson R300). Not being a techy guy, I'd assumed that given that there are USB2>Bluetooth adapter available Bluetooth would be at least as fast as USB1. Just spoken to a guy in a local pooter shop who stated that sending print files typical of SoHo design setups is going to be painfully slow with bluetooth. He said that I'd be much better off sticking with USB1 cables. Is this true? Would printing via bluetooth (just across a room) be painfully slow? Anyone with experience of bluetooth and/or specifically printing from a pooter to a desktop printer (inkjet, fwiw™) via bluetooth? tia

23-04-2004, 12:23	#4 (permalink)
oli I Call Shenanigans™ Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Manchester, England. Posts: 9,971	Setup a wireless lan, its pretty easy : http://www.wi-fiplanet.com/tutorials...le.php/3328001 __________________ Linked In :: Last.fm :: Twitter me ..................

08-01-2008, 18:53	#15 (permalink)
Foopers Registered User Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 1	Don't bother with bluetooth it is unbelievably slow unless you are just printing simple text documents. I have just been printing out some photos and went off for dinner for an hour or so and came back to find the tenth one just finishing!

08-01-2008, 19:00	#16 (permalink)
cocknose Banned™ Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Hong Kong Posts: 3,683	2004!!!!! __________________ Facebook me!

10-01-2008, 02:13	#17 (permalink)
proc355 Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Glasvegas Posts: 866	man, bluetooth is slow __________________ meh.

23-04-2004, 12:17	#2 (permalink)
tomson Christ on a bike Join Date: May 2003 Posts: 3,342	Why do you want to use bluetooth if its just across a room?

23-04-2004, 12:20	#3 (permalink)
Bill Posters trouble free and loverlee Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: YooKay Posts: 2,962	It's preferable to running a 10m daisy-chain of usb cables around the edge of the room - I would have thought.

23-04-2004, 12:32	#5 (permalink)
Bill Posters trouble free and loverlee Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: YooKay Posts: 2,962	A WiFi Lan setup (print server presumably with an additional access point) looks like overkill given that I only want to reach one printer on the other side of the room.

23-04-2004, 12:35	#6 (permalink)
Stickman Dr. Lucien Sanchez Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: UK Posts: 5,563	Move the printer nearer?

23-04-2004, 13:02	#9 (permalink)
Bill Posters trouble free and loverlee Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: YooKay Posts: 2,962	Just got a straight answer to my question at t'other place. Sorted. (ooh, get me) Cheers, Oli.

23-04-2004, 13:04	#10 (permalink)
Stickman Dr. Lucien Sanchez Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: UK Posts: 5,563	Lazy bugger - you could have googled the speeds if that's all you were after.

23-04-2004, 13:08	#11 (permalink)
tomson Christ on a bike Join Date: May 2003 Posts: 3,342	cables it is then

23-04-2004, 13:32	#12 (permalink)
Bill Posters trouble free and loverlee Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: YooKay Posts: 2,962	More than simply comp[aring the speeds, I was wondering if anyone used to printing via bluetooth could vouch for the perceived lag of using bluetooth over usb cable. i.e. did it really feel slow? The R300 printer will only be used for presentation prints so won't be getting a constant stream of prints to handle. Just as and when necessary. In the absence of experience, I'll probably default to basing the decision on actual speed. So… next question… What's the effective limit to which you can daisy-chain usb cables? I'd heard that no more than two was recommended (for one reason or another), but that was a bloke from Dixons, so… (I've not seen a usb cable longer than 3meters on my various snooping around on and offline) tia again

23-04-2004, 13:42	#13 (permalink)
tomson Christ on a bike Join Date: May 2003 Posts: 3,342	how about http://www.homestead.co.uk/usb444.htm

24-04-2004, 05:08	#14 (permalink)
Bill Posters trouble free and loverlee Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: YooKay Posts: 2,962	bingo. I've not heard of 'active repeater' cables. Perfick. cheers, old bean.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search