| Home | Register | FAQ | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Magazines™
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Glasgow..
Posts: 11,275
|
£500-£600 max seen this sony little bit more than wanted to spend http://www.espotting.dealtime.co.uk/xPC-Sony_DCR_TRV60E or http://www.ajelectronics.co.uk/ViewP...e=PON04B000008 |
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
hairball
Join Date: May 2003
Location: London
Posts: 3,158
|
Personally I'd go for this 3 chip Panasonic: Panasonic NVGS70B We still can't believe Panasonic has managed to fit three CCDs into a camcorder costing less than £600. But it has, and the results are superb. Colours are crisp and faithful, and the supporting autofocus and image stabilisation are close to the more expensive Sony DCR-TRV60 and Canon MVX10i. Not a single feature is lacking, including bi-directional AV and full-size S-Video, mic and headphones, plus there's an accessory shoe. With top-loading tapes and full manual control, this is a great all-round camcorder. (taken from a recent reveiw) |
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
volkswagen yellow & gold
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: london, england.
Posts: 6,214
|
i used to use a sony pc10 but now have a sony pc120 - it rocks. i've managed to make the value of the camera back by emailing pictures straight from the camera, via bluetooth to a picture desk. http://www.electricwarehouse.co.uk/m...t&ref=dealtime the next step up is getting into professional cameras and the price hike is just amusing. that DCR-TRV60 looks ok. you're missing a microphone input and headphone output but it depends on what you're gonna use it for - i like those features in a camera. |
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
volkswagen yellow & gold
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: london, england.
Posts: 6,214
|
also, that dcr-trv60 has no editing functions on the camera itself. i know its usually best to do your editing on a mac/pc afterwards but sometimes a simple fade in / fade out can save any of that hassle. |
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
This is it - ground zero.
|
Quote:
PS-Why does it seem that the available megapixels for DV Cams have not caught up with that offered by still cams? fun: HGC v.4 | last.fm: DT | me | oi! f*ck u roto: ...via meebo!
New to interweb design? Your friends at dt can help. |
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Hey Alan, nice rope!
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Cuntoff
Posts: 770
|
If I was buying a dv cam I'd go for either of these: Sony VX1000 or Canon DM XL1 - this is a bit steeper to buy but a decent example can be picked up for about a grand second-hand. Both are fine semi-pro dv-cams with 3x ccd for extra depth & quality to your footage. If just for filming 'at home' and 'upstairs' though, you'd be better off with a £500 job from dixons Don't get sand on your ice cream...
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) | |
|
Hey Alan, nice rope!
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Cuntoff
Posts: 770
|
Quote:
I didn't - I was hilariously implying that you might be making your own red-hot porno's...but you probably aren't, so just ignore me. But if you are...then that was good advice I gave you Don't get sand on your ice cream...
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
hairball
Join Date: May 2003
Location: London
Posts: 3,158
|
what are you gonna use it for mike? I bought my missus a cheap JVC one for crimbo - tis fine for filming the cat, taking on hols etc. No point in buying something broadcast quality if its only gonna be odds and sods you're filming. |
|
![]() |