Web Design Forums

pat · 19-06-2005, 15:54

Une tres joli site

http://mathildeaubier.free.fr/

pgo · 19-06-2005, 21:19

Haha, neat.

Some lovely work, but feels a bit trendy for my tastes - unindividual.

cam · 20-06-2005, 04:28

it's original, but the interface is annoying after a while

that's not the point though.,

pgo · 20-06-2005, 04:43

Go to "Liens" (links?) and rollover each one - they all stay in their hover state!

Wonder if that's how it's supposed to be or if they cocked it up.

Narate · 20-06-2005, 05:02

Doesnt do anything for me apart from make my cursor vanish.

pgo · 20-06-2005, 05:17

Move the mouse, there should be an arm there.

top_buzz · 21-06-2005, 08:04

pgo: I think the glasses are supposed to stay in the hover state otherwise they'd have to somehow unspill themselves when you mouse off

pgo · 21-06-2005, 08:13

Quote:

Originally Posted by top_buzz

pgo: I think the glasses are supposed to stay in the hover state otherwise they'd have to somehow unspill themselves when you mouse off

Good point. It's not the normal way of doing things and threw me off a bit.

BdB · 26-06-2005, 15:29

This site seems to be a typical example of bad accessibility. It doesn’t do anything on my browser. To qualify as a great webdesign a site should have great accessibility. I suggest a site like: http://www.anybrowser.org/campaign/

cam · 26-06-2005, 15:31

that site's domain is so true- it looks shit in anybrowser.

emil · 27-06-2005, 04:04

Quote:

Originally Posted by pat

http://mathildeaubier.free.fr/

C'est un site vraiment joli.

pgo · 27-06-2005, 04:37

Quote:

Originally Posted by BdB

To qualify as a great webdesign a site should have great accessibility.

I don't think that's always true. There are sites out there with no extra steps taken for accessibility that are also lovely to look at.

pat · 27-06-2005, 09:09

yeh i don't reckon asthetics should suffer for accessibility. If they're blind, they're not going to see it anyway.

cam · 27-06-2005, 09:26

Quote:

Originally Posted by pat

yeh i don't reckon asthetics should suffer for accessibility. If they're blind, they're not going to see it anyway.

haha, what a cunt

oli · 27-06-2005, 09:30

What a load of shit (the site)

19-06-2005, 15:54	#1 (permalink)
pat jorge regula Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: B'ham/Leeds Posts: 4,871	Mathilde Une tres joli site http://mathildeaubier.free.fr/ __________________

20-06-2005, 04:28	#3 (permalink)
cam vague™ Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Glasgow Posts: 5,513	it's original, but the interface is annoying after a while that's not the point though., __________________ The Blog™ \| Twitter \| LinkedIn

26-06-2005, 15:29	#9 (permalink)
BdB Registered User Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: The Netherlands Posts: 3	Bad accessibility This site seems to be a typical example of bad accessibility. It doesn’t do anything on my browser. To qualify as a great webdesign a site should have great accessibility. I suggest a site like: http://www.anybrowser.org/campaign/

26-06-2005, 15:31	#10 (permalink)
cam vague™ Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Glasgow Posts: 5,513	that site's domain is so true- it looks shit in anybrowser. __________________ The Blog™ \| Twitter \| LinkedIn

27-06-2005, 09:09	#13 (permalink)
pat jorge regula Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: B'ham/Leeds Posts: 4,871	yeh i don't reckon asthetics should suffer for accessibility. If they're blind, they're not going to see it anyway. __________________

19-06-2005, 21:19	#2 (permalink)
pgo Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 12,340	Haha, neat. Some lovely work, but feels a bit trendy for my tastes - unindividual.

20-06-2005, 04:43	#4 (permalink)
pgo Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 12,340	Go to "Liens" (links?) and rollover each one - they all stay in their hover state! Wonder if that's how it's supposed to be or if they cocked it up.

20-06-2005, 05:02	#5 (permalink)
Narate Royalty™ Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Manchester (UK) Posts: 3,248	Doesnt do anything for me apart from make my cursor vanish.

20-06-2005, 05:17	#6 (permalink)
pgo Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 12,340	Move the mouse, there should be an arm there.

21-06-2005, 08:04	#7 (permalink)
top_buzz For your health! Join Date: Jul 2004 Posts: 2,518	pgo: I think the glasses are supposed to stay in the hover state otherwise they'd have to somehow unspill themselves when you mouse off

27-06-2005, 09:30	#15 (permalink)
oli I Call Shenanigans™ Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Manchester, England. Posts: 9,748	What a load of shit (the site)

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search