Web Design Forums

Alexanda · 08-08-2005, 16:51

www.jetset.nl
www.eatock.com

adras · 08-08-2005, 16:56

the second one not so great

andrewparker · 08-08-2005, 16:57

Yep, some sweet stuff there (both sites).

nakedintruder · 08-08-2005, 17:12

Not my cuppa, I've seen sites like the first one so many times it winds me up by now

andrewparker · 08-08-2005, 17:18

Quote:

Originally Posted by nakedintruder

Not my cuppa, I've seen sites like the first one so many times it winds me up by now

Are you talking about the site or the work?

nakedintruder · 08-08-2005, 17:24

disclaimer - Design is subjective

The site mainly, but (in my opinion) the work on there's morbidly generic as well

Alexanda · 08-08-2005, 18:01

there is beauty in simplicity, its much more difficult to produce work that is broken down to its core message than use colour and pointless decoration.

nakedintruder · 08-08-2005, 19:14

yeh absolutely, (it doesn't devalidate my feeling on it though, it's brings nothing new and has been done before time over and better)

Transmogrify · 09-08-2005, 04:40

Can't say I'm into the tiny text too much, not with my eyes anyway. Zoom in a bit and it loses it's "style" a little bit. Interesting site though. Quite into the lost formats archive, although not 100% sure I'd put DVD in a "lost format archive", nor CD or memory stick though. They're certainly not lost formats.

Narate · 09-08-2005, 05:10

I thought the second was called "eatcock"

Some good stuff on both

bag · 09-08-2005, 09:33

Quote:

Originally Posted by nakedintruder

disclaimer - Design is subjective

The site mainly, but (in my opinion) the work on there's morbidly generic as well

the site [etock] is yes - however i feel thats the point.

In relation to the content its far from being generic and is actual far more interesting than the majority of folio sites out there.

Transmogrify · 09-08-2005, 10:41

I think it's more a case of "great content" rather than "great design". If the content was shit on both of those sites, the entire thing would suck.

oli · 09-08-2005, 11:34

lovely work on the first one.

08-08-2005, 16:51	#1 (permalink)
Alexanda European Champions 2008 Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Amsterdam Posts: 2,588	great designs www.jetset.nl www.eatock.com

08-08-2005, 16:56	#2 (permalink)
adras Zły Join Date: May 2004 Location: Toronto, Canada Posts: 2,140	the second one not so great __________________ Be Crisp (tm)

08-08-2005, 16:57	#3 (permalink)
andrewparker Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Manchester Posts: 979	Yep, some sweet stuff there (both sites). __________________ Andrew Parker --------------------- (Apple PowerBook G4 1.67GHz / 1Gb RAM / OS X / Safari )

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

08-08-2005, 17:12	#4 (permalink)
nakedintruder www.nakedintruder.com Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Leeds, Yorkshire Posts: 383	Not my cuppa, I've seen sites like the first one so many times it winds me up by now

08-08-2005, 17:24	#6 (permalink)
nakedintruder www.nakedintruder.com Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Leeds, Yorkshire Posts: 383	disclaimer - Design is subjective The site mainly, but (in my opinion) the work on there's morbidly generic as well

08-08-2005, 18:01	#7 (permalink)
Alexanda European Champions 2008 Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Amsterdam Posts: 2,588	there is beauty in simplicity, its much more difficult to produce work that is broken down to its core message than use colour and pointless decoration.

08-08-2005, 19:14	#8 (permalink)
nakedintruder www.nakedintruder.com Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Leeds, Yorkshire Posts: 383	yeh absolutely, (it doesn't devalidate my feeling on it though, it's brings nothing new and has been done before time over and better)

09-08-2005, 04:40	#9 (permalink)
Transmogrify Rough Creep Arse™ Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Vancouver, Canada Posts: 1,888	Can't say I'm into the tiny text too much, not with my eyes anyway. Zoom in a bit and it loses it's "style" a little bit. Interesting site though. Quite into the lost formats archive, although not 100% sure I'd put DVD in a "lost format archive", nor CD or memory stick though. They're certainly not lost formats.

09-08-2005, 05:10	#10 (permalink)
Narate Royalty™ Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Manchester (UK) Posts: 3,273	I thought the second was called "eatcock" Some good stuff on both

09-08-2005, 10:41	#12 (permalink)
Transmogrify Rough Creep Arse™ Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Vancouver, Canada Posts: 1,888	I think it's more a case of "great content" rather than "great design". If the content was shit on both of those sites, the entire thing would suck.

09-08-2005, 11:34	#13 (permalink)
oli Low flying star™ Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Manchester, England.™ Posts: 10,007	lovely work on the first one.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)