| Home | Register | FAQ | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Award Winning™
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,586
|
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/swas29.shtml also http://www.typographi.ca/ makes good reading |
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
less bounce to the ounce
|
After further review, how do you accidentally put 2 swastikas in a font? & mik, I had heard that the symbol had actually been benign in nature before the Nazis, however, I think there's too much attached to it now for it to ever be deemed that way again. |
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Rack off, ya dag™
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Manchester, England.™
Posts: 11,816
|
a movement to detoxify the symbol ? http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/swas29.shtml whats the point, consign it to history and move along |
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Award Winning™
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,586
|
very true roto yes there is a heap of shit associated to it, and yes it would be very difficult to unassociate anything to do with it. I agree with Oli no matter how you try do desensitise it how could anybody use it and for what purpose. i was going to post a few logos (swapping the original icons for swatsikas - just to show but i was slightly horrified and also it might have been deemed in bad taste. |
|
![]() |
|