| Home | Register | FAQ | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|
#1 (permalink) | |||
|
Dr. Macromedia
|
PNGs for 256 levels of transparency
What browsers do not support PNGs yet? I know from experience that NN7, NN6 and IE6 support PNGs.. What about the other browsers? Do they support PNGs and one of their key features which I am about to use to design a portfolio site - 254 levels of transparency? Before referring me to alistapart.com, From alistapart.com Quote:
Quote:
I've tried it in mozilla in linux and it works perfect. Not tried it with opera and netscape 6 though. I am definite it works in netscape 7 ( including 256 levels transparency ) and prolly IE 6 ( don't have that installed yet ). YES! alistpart answered part of my question... but I need more uptodate info. Do IE 6 / Firebird / Opera 7 support PNGs? The prob. is... Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
trouble free and loverlee
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: YooKay
Posts: 3,083
|
Its my understanding the MSIE6 doesn't *still* actually have proper PNG24 support. In fact, it is the only major, modern browser not to do so (despite full support being promised when MSIE4 was in development). Moe info: http://www.libpng.org/pub/png/pngapb...#msie-win-unix PNG browser support info: http://www.libpng.org/pub/png/pngapbr.html Add your shoulder to the wheel: http://www.petitiononline.com/msiepng/petition.html NB. MSIE5/Mac has full, effective (inline) support for PNG24. |
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Dr. Macromedia
|
Hmm... that means that I can't use PNGs and tat's all gill bate's fault It should be high time IE has PNG transparency! Netscape already does offer a level of PNG transparency support.. Isn't it weird that IE 5 in mac has full png support but IE 6 in windows doesn't?. What is gill bates trying to do ? :sigh: |
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
trouble free and loverlee
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: YooKay
Posts: 3,083
|
Suggested reading: Cross-Browser Variable Opacity with PNG: A Real Solution I personally opt for the 'AlphaImageLoader Filter' methods. Athough it relies on proprietory (read: invalid) css, I'm happy to use externalised/marginalised proprietory css to fix a proprietory problem. As a rule, I throw all such workarounds into one additional css file and @import it separately. That way you can have the invalid code in one file which won't effect the validation of the rest of your code. fwiw, the MSIE/Mac team are/were about as self-directing as a development team could get within MS. They clearly had more regard for standards (developmental and compliancy) than their MSIE/Win counterparts. If only the MSIE/Win team had been half as diligent and dedicated as the MSIE/Mac team, web design/development wouldn't cause half as many headaches as it currently does. |
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Award Winning™
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,568
|
Quote:
if only! |
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
trouble free and loverlee
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: YooKay
Posts: 3,083
|
Quote:
It only *needs* to work in MSIE/Win. MSIE/win is the only major browser than needs help to display PNG24 with alpha transparency. As already mentioned, the inability to display PNG24 alpha transparency is a problem that only effects MSIE/Win, so (imho) it's fine to use a solution that only works on MSIE/Win. Just to be clear: *Other browsers don't need the AlphaImageLoaderFilter* Here's a link to some info that will help you understand the situation a bit better - - - Mik, which bit? |
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
trouble free and loverlee
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: YooKay
Posts: 3,083
|
Oh, I dunno. I'd say the box model hack (or rather the need for it) has been one of the bigger setbacks in the movement towards progressive techniques. Mostly because it presents a rather large fly in the ointment when pitching css-for-layouts to the unititiated et al who fear change (or the expense it might incur). How do you see things? |
|
![]() |
|