[cyranoz]

Hello everybody,

I just wanted to know what you think of the design of my website... I'm not a flash expert, so I made something without a lot of effects... call it a "minimalist approach" ! lol

http://www.webcn-design.be

Don't forget to reload the page...

edit 11/03

Thanks for the comments.
But the comments before 08/25 are refered to the following version
http://intuxication.org/~webcn/www/old/

I changed it since then to do something compatible, that's all.

ps: it may also not stand out at all with the previous one...

edit: let me precise that for the present version, i have no merit for the flash diaporama. It has been made by picsengine (nice and easy!). So this topic is really not about the present version of the site, but for the previous one.

[cyranoz]

I know, i don't really expect anything from that site, I just had fun with the intro idea for itself, not for the goal of bringing new clients. The topic was about design, picture etc.
thanks anyway for the comments.

[deadgood]

Thats one grey looking site my friend ! Grey text on a grey background on a grey background isnt a good idea.

[cyranoz]

Thanks for the comments (and thanks for being honnest)

I know the intro is not explicit, but i wanted to say something like (without being pretentious, it's just the idea) "opening a new window on the net". I wanted to add a text to suggest it, but the result was not very good at the end, so i let it like that (even if the result is already that bad without it apparently - I accept your critics, i'm just disappointed i guess).

For the size of it, i know it, i did that a little quickly, just to try something on photoshop and convert it the easiest way (but not the best) for the net. It renders just as i wanted it with a 1024x768 resolution.

And i know what you (deadgood) mean by "grey looking site", but i see it blue, I just wanted to keep the combination of red and blue sky tones together, without any other color, i thought the result wasn't so bad.

And a little precision, i'm new here, so you must all be professionnal in this area, i'm not, i'm doing my best.

[dtrenz]

"creation & maintenance site internet?"

what the hell does that mean?

why so small?

why are there urls that I can't click?

[cyranoz]

Originally Posted by dtrenz

"creation & maintenance site internet?"

what the hell does that mean?

why so small?

why are there urls that I can't click?

2-3) small, it's my "minimalist approach" (it s... ok i god it), everybody does something big, i do it small, but readable (in 1024-768 only not bigger apparently I know i have to change that, i just tried it like that, it's a start, and anyway i know nobody ever go on my site), for the url, i did it fast, for the design, that's all.

[rbastien]

Not the best site for linux compatability (especially in 600x800). Is there a way you could move the title text up a little bit?

[saints]

It Looks Professional Dude Its Very Clean, But Deadgood Has A Point Though.

[cyranoz]

Originally Posted by Larixk

doesn't stand out at all.

Thanks for the comments.
But the previous comments are refered to the following version
http://intuxication.org/~webcn/www/old/

I changed it since then to do something compatible, that's all.

ps: it may also not stand out at all with the previous one...

[5P4C3]

It´s a little boring with all the soft greey/blue

[Larixk]

doesn't stand out at all.

[5P4C3]

Originally Posted by Larixk

doesn't stand out at all.

true

[andr3www]

Nice general aspect, but I don't like the first page. I looks like an ERROR 404 page Do somethingmore ingenious, add some design elements, not only text.