| Home | Register | FAQ | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
For your health!
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,447
|
I feel violated!
Some nob nose has been using an swf decompiler to completely rip off loads of my banners! He's done direct copies of some of my stuff then stuck shitty text tweens zooming around on top. Pisses me off that hes making money off stuff i've done Is there anything I can do? |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
For your health!
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,447
|
Quote:
The company they were for is a client of mine. They use this guy sometimes when i'm too busy, so I don't think they'll be bothered I guess its tough shit. |
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Work faster microphone ..
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Cambridge, UK
Posts: 1,709
|
Quote:
Bollocks it is. This kind of thing makes me seeth. The client shouldn't own the SWF's of the end product they paid for (ie. the final banners) - and therefore have no rights to change them and re-use them without your permission - you are the copyright holder to the source files not them (and I'm crossing my fingers that you used a decent contract here, but unless you specifically gave them copyright, you're ok) . This is if the banners used are ones you made for that particular client - if not - then the client and the designer are both putting themselves in a shaky legal position, and it will be even easier for you to force them to stop, and take the banners down. I suggest you start with a polite letter to all parties - you need to nip this in the bud or it will carry on and get worse - if you want help with it PM me and I'll happily help you put something together to send them. |
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
vague™
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 5,365
|
That's shit, Nick. I'd say a polite, but firm, letter is the only possible recourse you have. The legality of reverse engineering is particularly untested ground when it comes to software in the UK (more on that here) - not that legal action is something i'd recommend you consider. Send a letter to the developer first, making it clear you know what's happening and that you're not happy about it (I'd also add the fact that you are willing to contact the client directly to let them know) and see what happens. |
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
vague™
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 5,365
|
Oh, and I seem to remember reading a while ago that it's possible to process your swf's and make them either more difficult or impossible to decompile. I'm not really a regular flash user, but I'm sure google could find some stuff. |
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bristol
Posts: 3,155
|
Quote:
Why not? what they don't own is the .fla - but they can do what they like with the graphics (not sure about ripping the .swfs) if this was for anyone else other than the client they were originally made for you'd have more of case. Time to tighten up your terms and conditions to make sure it can't happen again - and go round to the person in question with a baseball bat, take it to his computer and tell him not to use an swf decompiler on your work ever again or you'll do the same to his kneecaps |
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) | |
|
fucksocks™
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: in the boosh
Posts: 1,615
|
Quote:
haha! now we're getting somewhere! On a more helpful note, I believe swift optimizer helps protect your flash swf from decompliers. From my limited experience of decompliers, they seem to rely heavily on the the timeline to draw out the code so avoiding the main timeline and using functions embedded in movieclips rather than tweens should help. |
|
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) |
|
For your health!
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,447
|
Just got myself this app: http://www.amayeta.com/software/swfencrypt/ Hope it'll be enough to stop the little stain. |
|
![]() |