View Single Post
Old 26-03-2008, 16:00   #4 (permalink)
dudefromthenet
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 19
For a larger websites a good CMS can make things easier. But it will be slower. I made benchmarks. I have created a website with typo3 (php) and my PC could serve 30pages per second (without images etc.). The same website in a static HTML version (the user does not see a difference) could be served by the same PC around 3000times per second which is an increase of 100x!
Drupal is much faster than typo3, but a static HTML will be always faster.

I programmed a simple CMS myself that creates static pages if possible which are then stored on the server. With this approach it is very fast, but also not as flexible as a normal CMS.
  Reply With Quote